The Hostile Media Effect and Its Potential Consequences

The Hostile Media Effect and Its Potential Consequences
Author: Zhennan Liu
Publisher:
Total Pages: 94
Release: 2019
Genre: China
ISBN:

The purpose of this study is to explore American and Chinese's perception towards foreign media's coverage about their own country, as well as the main influencing factors and its consequences of this phenomenon. We designed an online survey based on the existing literature on hostile media perception. The sample included 301 American participants and 300 Chinese participants (N=601). The current study used paired sample T test, Pearson correlation coefficient and SEM model test. Three important results were found. First, hostile media perception is widespread. In the study, both American and Chinese participants were biased to varying degrees against foreign media coverage about their country. Second, people's group identification was directly affects their perception about foreign media coverage. Finally, people's acceptance of the influence of foreign media's reports on their own countries will directly lead to participants' support the government increase the budget on public relationship. The main significance of this study is to discuss the hostile media perception towards non-domestic media in different countries and its consequences. From the overall perspective, group identification (GI), media credibility (MC), hostile media perception (HMP), influence of presumed influence (IPI) and corrective action (A) are a set of links with causal relationship. After model testing, we found that the results support this model too.

The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication

The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication
Author: Kate Kenski
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Total Pages: 977
Release: 2017-06-23
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 0199793484

Since its development shaped by the turmoil of the World Wars and suspicion of new technologies such as film and radio, political communication has become a hybrid field largely devoted to connecting the dots among political rhetoric, politicians and leaders, voters' opinions, and media exposure to better understand how any one aspect can affect the others. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson bring together leading scholars, including founders of the field of political communication Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler, Doris Graber, Max McCombs, and Thomas Paterson,to review the major findings about subjects ranging from the effects of political advertising and debates and understandings and misunderstandings of agenda setting, framing, and cultivation to the changing contours of social media use in politics and the functions of the press in a democratic system. The essays in this volume reveal that political communication is a hybrid field with complex ancestry, permeable boundaries, and interests that overlap with those of related fields such as political sociology, public opinion, rhetoric, neuroscience, and the new hybrid on the quad, media psychology. This comprehensive review of the political communication literature is an indispensible reference for scholars and students interested in the study of how, why, when, and with what effect humans make sense of symbolic exchanges about sharing and shared power. The sixty-two chapters in The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication contain an overview of past scholarship while providing critical reflection of its relevance in a changing media landscape and offering agendas for future research and innovation.

Political Discussions and the Media

Political Discussions and the Media
Author: Patrick Albert Bascom
Publisher:
Total Pages: 112
Release: 2016
Genre: Discrimination
ISBN:

This study looked to expand on previous research on the hostile media effect. Looking at the predictors of perceived hostility and effects of partisanship and perceived hostility to determine the implications for political engagement. Unlike other studies on the hostile media effect, this study was a qualitative one. The methodology provided very interesting results on the perception of bias, political engagement, and also a unique look at the perception of bias by Republican women. The study found that there are specific decisions strong partisans make when deciding whether or not to discuss politics. It was found that identification with a group and anticipating third person effects leads people to engage differently in face-to-face and on social media, and that these differences were evidence of the hostile media effect. Although future research is suggested, this study is a great start to expanding the knowledge of political engagement in a political climate that is perceived to be hostile and biased.

Hostile Media Effect

Hostile Media Effect
Author: Elizabeth B. Hughes
Publisher:
Total Pages: 93
Release: 2011
Genre: Electronic Dissertations
ISBN:

The perception that the media are biased against one's point of view is one that researchers have examined for more than two decades, and the theory of the Hostile Media Perception, also known as the Hostile Media Effect (HME), has been attached to the phenomenon (Vallone, Ross & Lepper, 1985). This particular study examined the Hostile Media Effect by cross-varying news article's subject (in this case, either a Democratic or Republican County Commissioner candidate and a Democratic or Republican U. S. Senator candidate) and participant partisanship (either Republican or Democrat). Study participants read two articles, one about a Republican candidate for U.S. Senator or County Commission and one about a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senator or County Commission. Going into the study, it was anticipated that there would be a higher occurrence of HME when participants read articles about the candidates seeking the higher level office of U. S. Senate. Another fundamental assumption of the study was that there would be a hostile media effect, that is, that Republicans would see the articles biased toward Democrats and vice versa. This, however, did not occur. Study analysis revealed a consistent occurrence of the opposite of hostile media effect.

Thinking about the Media: a Review of Theory and Research on Media Perceptions, Media Effects Perceptions, and Their Consequences

Thinking about the Media: a Review of Theory and Research on Media Perceptions, Media Effects Perceptions, and Their Consequences
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2017
Genre:
ISBN:

Abstract: This review explicates the past, present and future of theory and research concerning audience perceptions of the media as well as the effects that perceptions of media have on audiences. Before the sections that examine media perceptions and media effects perceptions, we first identify various psychological concepts and processes involved in generating media-related perceptions. In the first section, we analyze two types of media perceptions: media trust/credibility perceptions and bias perceptions, focusing on research on the Hostile Media Perception. In both cases, we address the potential consequences of these perceptions. In the second section, we assess theory and research on perceptions of media effects (often referred to as Presumed Influence) and their consequences (referred to as the Influence of Presumed Influence). As examples of Presumed Influence, we evaluate the literature on the Persuasive Press Inference and the Third-Person Perception. The bodies of research on me

Media Effects

Media Effects
Author: W. James Potter
Publisher: SAGE
Total Pages: 401
Release: 2012-01-03
Genre: Language Arts & Disciplines
ISBN: 1412964695

"Media Effects offers students an in-depth examination of the media's constant influence on individuals and society. W. James Potter frames media's effects in two templates: influence on individuals and influence on larger social structures and institutions. By positioning the different types of effects in the forefront, Potter helps students understand the full range of media effects, how they manifest themselves, and the factors that that are likely to bring these effects into being. Throughout the book, Potter encourages students to analyze their own experiences by searching for evidence of these effects in their own lives, making the content meaningful on a personal level." -- Provided by publisher.

Plugged in

Plugged in
Author: Patti M. Valkenburg
Publisher: Yale University Press
Total Pages: 341
Release: 2017-01-01
Genre: Psychology
ISBN: 0300218877

Cover -- Half-title -- Title -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Preface -- 1 Youth and Media -- 2 Then and Now -- 3 Themes and Theoretical Perspectives -- 4 Infants, Toddlers, and Preschoolers -- 5 Children -- 6 Adolescents -- 7 Media and Violence -- 8 Media and Emotions -- 9 Advertising and Commercialism -- 10 Media and Sex -- 11 Media and Education -- 12 Digital Games -- 13 Social Media -- 14 Media and Parenting -- 15 The End -- Notes -- Acknowledgments -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z

Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters

Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters
Author: Jonathan M. Ladd
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Total Pages: 287
Release: 2011-12-05
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 140084035X

As recently as the early 1970s, the news media was one of the most respected institutions in the United States. Yet by the 1990s, this trust had all but evaporated. Why has confidence in the press declined so dramatically over the past 40 years? And has this change shaped the public's political behavior? This book examines waning public trust in the institutional news media within the context of the American political system and looks at how this lack of confidence has altered the ways people acquire political information and form electoral preferences. Jonathan Ladd argues that in the 1950s, '60s, and early '70s, competition in American party politics and the media industry reached historic lows. When competition later intensified in both of these realms, the public's distrust of the institutional media grew, leading the public to resist the mainstream press's information about policy outcomes and turn toward alternative partisan media outlets. As a result, public beliefs and voting behavior are now increasingly shaped by partisan predispositions. Ladd contends that it is not realistic or desirable to suppress party and media competition to the levels of the mid-twentieth century; rather, in the contemporary media environment, new ways to augment the public's knowledgeability and responsiveness must be explored. Drawing on historical evidence, experiments, and public opinion surveys, this book shows that in a world of endless news sources, citizens' trust in institutional media is more important than ever before.