Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Aviation Safety

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Aviation Safety
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Aviation Safety
Publisher:
Total Pages: 57
Release: 1997
Genre: Aeronautics, Military
ISBN:

The objective of the study was to make recommendations regarding ways to reduce the rate of military aviation accidents, and, more importantly, to reduce the recent rise in loss of life that accompanies these avoidable events. The following specific tasks were outlined in the Terms of Reference (TOR): TOR#1: Determine the need/value of a joint program to require a standardized process for reporting and assessing the causes of accidents. TOR#2: Determine the effectiveness of methods presently used to disseminate lessons learned to help prevent accidents. TOR#3: Recommend new approaches to reduce the incidence of recurring safety problems. These problems include accident causal factors such as human error and controlled flight into terrain. TOR#4: Assess the need for a DoD-wide Human Performance network to improve the identification and dissemination of lessons learned across the Services. TOR#5: Recommend new approaches to institutionalize risk management within the Services, and TOR#6: Provide recommendations concerning flight safety technologies that should be installed on each type of aircraft.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Aviation Safety

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Aviation Safety
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 71
Release: 1997
Genre:
ISBN:

The Task Force was formed in November 1996. It met formally eight times. Three of those meetings took place at the Safety Centers of the Army, Navy (Marine) and Air Force. The objective of the study was to make recommendations regarding ways to reduce the rate of military aviation accidents, and, more importantly, to reduce the recent rise in loss of life that accompanies these avoidable events. The following specific tasks were outlined in the Terms of Reference (TOR): TOR#1: Determine the need/value of a joint program to require a standardized process for reporting and assessing the causes of accidents. TOR#2: Determine the effectiveness of methods presently used to disseminate lessons learned to help prevent accidents. TOR#3: Recommend new approaches to reduce the incidence of recurring safety problems. These problems include accident causal factors such as human error and controlled flight into terrain. TOR#4: Assess the need for a DoD-wide Human Performance network to improve the identification and dissemination of lessons learned across the Services. TOR#5: Recommend new approaches to institutionalize risk management within the Services, and TOR#6: Provide recommendations concerning flight safety technologies that should be installed on each type of aircraft.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Aircraft Assessment

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Aircraft Assessment
Author: DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD WASHINGTON DC.
Publisher:
Total Pages: 31
Release: 1993
Genre:
ISBN:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Aircraft Assessment was convened to respond to the direction received from Congress in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, (Public Law 102-484). The Authorization Act requested the Defense Science Board address two issues that are related to the DoD Tactical Aviation Modernization Program. The two issues pertain to (1) potential common aircraft/avionics for use by the Navy and Air Force for parallel missions, and (2) technical risk assessments for the F-22, F/A-18E/F and A/F-X aircraft.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) Program

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) Program
Author: United States. Defense Science Board
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 137
Release: 1994
Genre: Air weapons
ISBN: 1428982930

The Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) resulted from the decisions of the Secretary of Defense' Bottom Up Review (BUR). Each service has a demonstrated need for advanced technology aircraft to meet future contingencies, but it was determined that costs for development and production of these several different aircraft could not be met due to budgetary constraints. The BUR found that there were not enough resources available to support all these programs in future years. The decision was made to continue with the Air Force F-22 fighter aircraft, and the F/A-18E/F aircraft for the Navy, but to cancel the A/F-X and the MRF. The decision on ASTOL was to continue that research, but to secure specific commitment of resources by at least two of the three Services before building a flying prototype. The BUR also confirmed the continuing needs that were to be met by the A/F-X and MRF programs. This led to the establishment of the Joint Advanced Strike Technology Program in July 1993.