Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (formerly Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc.)

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (formerly Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc.)
Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher: Canadian Museum of Civilization/Musee Canadien Des Civilisations
Total Pages: 72
Release: 2007
Genre: Transportation
ISBN:

The National Energy Board publishes reasons for decisions when it expects its decisions to influence actions beyond the particular case that was heard. In 2006 and 2007, in response to apportionment concerns on the Trans Mountain pipeline system, Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. (now Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc.) submitted a series of applications to the National Energy Board of revisions to the Trans Mountain Tariffs. Four of these applications proposed significant and controversial changes to the capacity allocation procedures on the pipeline system. The Board's decisions on these applications, with reasons, were released 15 March 2006, 12 April 2006, 20 July 2006 and 16 August 2007. This document compiles these four decisions for ease of reference.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of TransCanada PipeLines Limited and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of TransCanada PipeLines Limited and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd
Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher:
Total Pages: 100
Release: 2007
Genre: Gas industry
ISBN:

Discusses the background and the report of the National Energy Board (NEB) with regard to the application by TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd. to transfer certain pipeline facilities presently comprising part of the TransCanada mainline natural gas transmission system from TransCanada to Keystone for use in Keystone's proposed new oil pipeline. Included in the data is information on the regulatory standard, a discussion of energy supply, markets and pipelines, and the potential impacts of the transfer.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC
Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher:
Total Pages: 60
Release: 2013
Genre: Petroleum
ISBN:

"In this proceeding, the Board was asked by Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC as General Partner of Trans Mountain Pipeline L.P. (Trans Mountain) to consider the toll methodology, and the terms and conditions that would apply to the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline (Expanded System), if such an expansion is built in the future. The applied-for toll methodology resulted from an open season consisting of three rounds (Open Season) and is based on negotiated tolls rather than cost of service"--Document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc
Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher:
Total Pages: 36
Release: 2008
Genre: Petroleum
ISBN:

This document concerns an application to the National Energy Board (NEB) dated 14 March 2008 by Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (TMI) for approval of proposed Tariff No. 74, Rules and Regulations Governing the Transportation of Petroleum, to be effective 1 May 2008, the in-service date for Phase 1 of the TMX Anchor Loop Expansion Project, filed with the NEB under File No. OF-Tolls-Group1-T246-2008-02 01; and Hearing Order RH-4-2008, heard in Calgary, Alberta on 4 September 2008. This document provides an overview of the matters considered by the NEB in reaching a decision on the application and details of the NEB's assessment of issues identified by the NEB or by parties to the proceeding, including: the allocation of capacity with respect to receipts and deliveries at Kamloops; the appropriate capacity to be allocated for deliveries over the Westridge Dock; the appropriate tariff, rules and regulations governing nominations and the allocation of capacity for deliveries over the Westridge Dock; the definition of Land versus Dock Deliveries; the appropriate tariff, rules and regulations governing nominations and the allocation of capacity for deliveries to land-based destinations; whether there should be a regular review by TMI and its shippers of capacity allocations to the various destinations on the Trans Mountain pipeline system; and whether the proposed allocation procedures to accommodate Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Anchor Loop TMX expansion are consistent with the National Energy Board Act.--Includes text from document.