Raising the Agencies' Grades
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 152 |
Release | : 2011 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : |
Download Raising The Agencies Grades full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Raising The Agencies Grades ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 152 |
Release | : 2011 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : |
Author | : Susan Debra Blum |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 0 |
Release | : 2020 |
Genre | : Grading and marking (Students) |
ISBN | : 9781949199819 |
The moment is right for critical reflection on what has been assumed to be a core part of schooling. In Ungrading, fifteen educators write about their diverse experiences going gradeless. Some contributors are new to the practice and some have been engaging in it for decades. Some are in humanities and social sciences, some in STEM fields. Some are in higher education, but some are the K-12 pioneers who led the way. Based on rigorous and replicated research, this is the first book to show why and how faculty who wish to focus on learning, rather than sorting or judging, might proceed. It includes honest reflection on what makes ungrading challenging, and testimonials about what makes it transformative. CONTRIBUTORS: Aaron Blackwelder Susan D. Blum Arthur Chiaravalli Gary Chu Cathy N. Davidson Laura Gibbs Christina Katopodis Joy Kirr Alfie Kohn Christopher Riesbeck Starr Sackstein Marcus Schultz-Bergin Clarissa Sorensen-Unruh Jesse Stommel John Warner
Author | : Richard Rothstein |
Publisher | : Teachers College Press |
Total Pages | : 280 |
Release | : 2008-12-14 |
Genre | : Education |
ISBN | : 9780807749395 |
Yes, we should hold public schools accountable for effectively spending the vast funds with which they have been entrusted. But accountability policies like No Child Left Behind, based exclusively on math and reading test scores, have narrowed the curriculum, misidentified both failing and successful schools, and established irresponsible expectations for what schools can accomplish. Instead of just grading progress in one or two narrow subjects, we should hold schools accountable for the broad outcomes we expect from public education —basic knowledge and skills, critical thinking, an appreciation of the arts, physical and emotional health, and preparation for skilled employment —and then develop the means to measure and ensure schools’ success in achieving them. Grading Education describes a new kind of accountability plan for public education, one that relies on higher-quality testing, focuses on professional evaluation, and builds on capacities we already possess. This important resource: Describes the design of an alternative accountability system that would not corrupt education as does NCLB and its state testing systems Explains the original design of NAEP in the 1960s, and shows why it should be revived. Defines the broad goals of education, beyond math and reading test scores, and reports on surveys to confirm public and governmental support for such goals. Relates these broad goals of education to the desire for accountability in education.
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1276 |
Release | : 1992 |
Genre | : Government publications |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, and Related Agencies |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1776 |
Release | : 1979 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, and Related Agencies |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 1774 |
Release | : 1979 |
Genre | : United States |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Post Office and Civil Service |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 316 |
Release | : 1961 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : |
Author | : Joe Feldman |
Publisher | : Corwin Press |
Total Pages | : 282 |
Release | : 2018-09-25 |
Genre | : Education |
ISBN | : 1506391591 |
"Joe Feldman shows us how we can use grading to help students become the leaders of their own learning and lift the veil on how to succeed. . . . This must-have book will help teachers learn to implement improved, equity-focused grading for impact." —Zaretta Hammond, Author of Culturally Responsive Teaching & The Brain Crack open the grading conversation Here at last—and none too soon—is a resource that delivers the research base, tools, and courage to tackle one of the most challenging and emotionally charged conversations in today’s schools: our inconsistent grading practices and the ways they can inadvertently perpetuate the achievement and opportunity gaps among our students. With Grading for Equity, Joe Feldman cuts to the core of the conversation, revealing how grading practices that are accurate, bias-resistant, and motivational will improve learning, minimize grade inflation, reduce failure rates, and become a lever for creating stronger teacher-student relationships and more caring classrooms. Essential reading for schoolwide and individual book study or for student advocates, Grading for Equity provides A critical historical backdrop, describing how our inherited system of grading was originally set up as a sorting mechanism to provide or deny opportunity, control students, and endorse a "fixed mindset" about students’ academic potential—practices that are still in place a century later A summary of the research on motivation and equitable teaching and learning, establishing a rock-solid foundation and a "true north" orientation toward equitable grading practices Specific grading practices that are more equitable, along with teacher examples, strategies to solve common hiccups and concerns, and evidence of effectiveness Reflection tools for facilitating individual or group engagement and understanding As Joe writes, "Grading practices are a mirror not just for students, but for us as their teachers." Each one of us should start by asking, "What do my grading practices say about who I am and what I believe?" Then, let’s make the choice to do things differently . . . with Grading for Equity as a dog-eared reference.