Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers

Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers
Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
Total Pages: 210
Release: 2000-10-08
Genre: Education
ISBN: 0309069963

The concept of postdoctoral training came to science and engineering about a century ago. Since the 1960s, the performance of research in the United States has increasingly relied on these recent PhDs who work on a full-time, but on a temporary basis, to gain additional research experience in preparation for a professional research career. Such experiences are increasingly seen as central to careers in research, but for many, the postdoctoral experience falls short of expectations. Some postdocs indicate that they have not received the recognition, standing or compensation that is commensurate with their experience and skills. Is this the case? If so, how can the postdoctoral experience be enhanced for the over 40,000 individuals who hold these positions at university, government, and industry laboratories? This new book offers its assessment of the postdoctoral experience and provides principles, action points, and recommendations for enhancing that experience.

Approaches for Evaluating the NRC Resident Research Associateship Program at NIST

Approaches for Evaluating the NRC Resident Research Associateship Program at NIST
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Total Pages: 170
Release: 2007-12-30
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 0309112184

The NRC Resident Research Associateship Program at NIST provides two-year temporary appointments for outstanding scientists and engineers. This book describes program applicants and awardees and offers suggestions for an in-depth assessment of career outcomes. Preliminary investigation indicates that outreach efforts produce more qualified applicants than NIST has slots to fill, the pool of applicants is increasingly diverse, and many Research Associates go on to permanent positions at NIST. The agency should conduct a more thorough evaluation of the program, including an assessment of outreach to potential applicants, individuals who decline an award, the program's impact on the careers of awardees, and the benefits of the program to NIST and the broader scientific and engineering community.