Maryland Reports

Maryland Reports
Author: Maryland. Court of Appeals
Publisher:
Total Pages: 636
Release: 1854
Genre: Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN:

Maryland Reports

Maryland Reports
Author: Maryland. Court of Appeals
Publisher:
Total Pages: 808
Release: 2012
Genre: Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN:

Maryland Reports

Maryland Reports
Author: Maryland. Court of Appeals
Publisher:
Total Pages: 692
Release: 1852
Genre: Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN:

Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland and in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland, From First Harris & Mchenry's Reports to First Maryland Reports, Volumes 15-16

Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland and in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland, From First Harris & Mchenry's Reports to First Maryland Reports, Volumes 15-16
Author: William Theophilus Brantly
Publisher: Legare Street Press
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2023-07-18
Genre:
ISBN: 9781022468559

This comprehensive legal reference includes a wide range of cases argued and adjudged in the Maryland courts in the early 19th century. Covering topics from property law to contract disputes to criminal trials, these reports offer an invaluable look at the legal system as it existed in this period. Whether you are a legal scholar or simply interested in history, Reports of Cases will help you gain a deeper understanding of the early American legal system. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Maryland Reports

Maryland Reports
Author: Maryland. Court of Appeals
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 1869
Genre: Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN:

Maryland Reports

Maryland Reports
Author: Maryland. Court of Appeals
Publisher:
Total Pages: 664
Release: 1861
Genre: Law reports, digests, etc
ISBN:

Maryland Reports; Cases Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland

Maryland Reports; Cases Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland
Author: Maryland Court Of Appeals
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
Total Pages: 222
Release: 2013-09
Genre:
ISBN: 9781230110943

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1874 edition. Excerpt: ...case, instructed the jury that a passenger on a railway car who has unconsciously suffered his elbow to slip out beyond the window-sill, is not necessarily guilty of negligence, and submitted it to them as a question of fact whether under all the circumstances of the case, the plaintiff in permitting his arm or elbow so to project, was or was not guilty of negligence. This ruling being assigned for error, the Supreme Court carefully considered the question. Their opinion was delivered by C. J. THoMPSoN, who says, " we must regard the remark, 'unconsciously suffered his elbow to slip beyond the window-sill, ' to mean inattentively. In that sense it was negligently suffered to slip. Of course this was negligence in se, unless he was under no obligation to take care of himself. But no case asserts that, and every case the contrary. Out of the omission to do so springs the doctrine of contributory negligence, which defeats a plaintiff, and which is so firmly established as a principle of law, that nobody dreams of doubting it. We have then the case broadly, I think, that negligence is not to be inferred, when injury accrues from an exposure of an elbow, or an arm, out of a car window, if it be not wilfully done. This cannot be maintained on any reasonable principle, we think. When a passenger on a railroad purchases his ticket, it entitles him to a seat in the cars. In the seat no part of his body is exposed to obstacles outside of the car. He is secure there ordinarily, from any contact with them, where he is thus provided with a seat, safe and secure in the absence of accident to the train, and the carrier has a safe and convenient car, well conducted, and skilfully managed, his duty is performed towards the passenger....

Maryland Reports; Cases Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland

Maryland Reports; Cases Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of Maryland
Author: Maryland Court Of Appeals
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
Total Pages: 240
Release: 2013-09
Genre:
ISBN: 9781230104157

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1919 edition. Excerpt: ...was properly to be regarded as a class of itself, and because there was no general law covering the conditions there involved. The special law now under inquiry is directed and confined to a case for which ample provision is made by an existing general law, and hence it is an enactment which the Constitution plainly and positively prohibits. Statutes: date for becoming efiective. Repeats by implica-tion. Tax easemptionsc discretion of Legislature; mortgages held by domestic fire insur-ance companies; Chapter 197 of the Acts of 1914. Under section 31 of Article 3 of the Constitution, unless otherwise provided in the terms of a statute, an Act of the Legislature becomes efiective on the 1st of June following its passage. pp. 383-334 Repeal of statutes by mere implication are never favored by the courts. p-335 It is only when there is a plain, unavoidable repugnflllcy between the statutes that a later Act is held to repeal a former one by implication. P-385 If a subsequent Act can be made, by any reasonable con struction, to stand with previous legislation, that construction will always be adopted. P-385 This is especially true of Acts passed at one and-the same session of the Legislature; in such cases there is a strong presumption against an implied repeal, and they are to be construed together, if possible, so as to give eflect to each. P-385 References to the Code, in amending the laws, may be either to the Code of 1904, or to 1912, where the sections of the Code of 1904 are identical and unchanged in the Code of 1912. The wisdom of granting exemption from taxation is within the discretion of the Legislature, and is not subject to control of the courts; and is not in contravention either of the State or of the Federal Constitution when...