Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection

Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection
Author: Isaac Ehrlich
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2009
Genre:
ISBN:

The article develops a theory of demand for insurance that emphasizes the interaction between market insurance, self-insurance, and self- rotection. The effects of changes in prices, income, and other variables on the demand for these alternative forms of insurance are analyzed using the state preference approach to behavior under uncertainty. Market insurance and self-insurance are shown to be substitutes, but market insurance and self-protection can be complements. The analysis challenges the notion that moral hazard is an inevitable consequence of market insurance, by showing that under certain conditions the latter may lead to a reduction in the probabilities of hazardous events.

The Interrelation Between Self-Insurance and Insurance

The Interrelation Between Self-Insurance and Insurance
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2015
Genre:
ISBN:

So far, research has only considered the case of a self-insurance independent premium when trying to model the interaction between self-insurance and market insurance. Ehrlich and Becker were in 1972 the first to formalize a model that accounted for marker insurance, self-insurance and self-protection. However they only found substitution between self-insurance and market insurance and this result has since been accepted as a general truth. Other authors have only focused on particular cases, such as unreliable self-insurance or increased risk aversion. This thesis shows that, accounting for the efforts invested in self-insurance, there may actually be cases with complementarity between self-insurance and market insurance. This is a significant result, as risk managers are theoretically supposed to maximize their utility, searching for the best trade-off between the risk control tools that are available to them. Associating self-insurance with market insurance may actually be a tool available to them that has been neglected in the past. Through this study, we are able to provide specific counter-examples to Ehrlich's and Becker's general results. This way, the reflection is brought upon the accuracy of risk management models and the possibility to account for self-insurance efforts in insurance contracts.

Handbook of Insurance

Handbook of Insurance
Author: Georges Dionne
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Total Pages: 1133
Release: 2013-12-02
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 1461401550

This new edition of the Handbook of Insurance reviews the last forty years of research developments in insurance and its related fields. A single reference source for professors, researchers, graduate students, regulators, consultants and practitioners, the book starts with the history and foundations of risk and insurance theory, followed by a review of prevention and precaution, asymmetric information, risk management, insurance pricing, new financial innovations, reinsurance, corporate governance, capital allocation, securitization, systemic risk, insurance regulation, the industrial organization of insurance markets and other insurance market applications. It ends with health insurance, longevity risk, long-term care insurance, life insurance financial products and social insurance. This second version of the Handbook contains 15 new chapters. Each of the 37 chapters has been written by leading authorities in risk and insurance research, all contributions have been peer reviewed, and each chapter can be read independently of the others.

Insurance, Protection from Risk, and Risk-Bearing

Insurance, Protection from Risk, and Risk-Bearing
Author: Isaac Ehrlich
Publisher:
Total Pages: 14
Release: 2008
Genre:
ISBN:

By extending Ehrlich and Becker's analysis of the demand for insurance we derive several new propositions concerning the demand for self-insurance, self-protection, and market insurance under alternative market conditions. A key behavioural prediction is that if the price of market insurance were responsive to self-protection, then the latter would induce a substitution away from self-insurance and towards market insurance, regardless of the fairness of insurance terms, as long as the utility function exhibits constant or decreasing absolute risk aversion. We compare two of our results to earlier results recently published in this journal by Boyer and Dionne.

Handbook of Choice Modelling

Handbook of Choice Modelling
Author: Stephane Hess
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Total Pages: 721
Release: 2014-08-29
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 1781003157

The Handbook of Choice Modelling, composed of contributions from senior figures in the field, summarizes the essential analytical techniques and discusses the key current research issues. The book opens with Nobel Laureate Daniel McFadden calling for d

Consumption Vs. Production of Insurance

Consumption Vs. Production of Insurance
Author: Tomas J. Philipson
Publisher:
Total Pages: 56
Release: 1997
Genre: Insurance pools
ISBN:

Many forms of insurance are produced by groups themselves rather than purchased in the market. For example, coverage for workers compensation provided by employers is often produced by the employer, in the sense that the employer bears some or all of the financial risk associated with the insurance. This paper generalizes the theory of insurance to analyze what factors determine whether groups produce insurance internally by self-insuring or consume it by purchasing coverage in the market. The" theory makes cross-sectional predictions on which firms will choose to produce insurance, as well as how prices and loss experience will vary with the production decision; the theory also predicts which lines of insurance are likely to be associated with internal production and those in which coverage will be provided entirely by the market. Furthermore, the time-series properties of claims under various degrees of internal" production are analyzed, revealing a more pronounced lag structure for claims under partial risk-bearing than under full self-insurance or market insurance. These predictions are generated by a fundamental diseconomy of scale that offsets the standard scale economy associated with risk-pooling. The tradeoff facing a group in its make-or-buy decision is that self-insurance rewards self-protection but forgoes the pooling of risk" with members outside the group