Keystone Oil Pipeline Project Applicant For Presidential Permit Transcanada Keystone Pipeline Lp
Download Keystone Oil Pipeline Project Applicant For Presidential Permit Transcanada Keystone Pipeline Lp full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Keystone Oil Pipeline Project Applicant For Presidential Permit Transcanada Keystone Pipeline Lp ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!
Draft supplemental environmental impact statement for the Keystone XL Project
Author | : United States. Department of State. Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : |
Release | : 2013 |
Genre | : Environmental impact statements |
ISBN | : |
Presidential Permit Application From TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP.
Author | : Trans-Canada |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : |
Release | : 2012 |
Genre | : Environmental impact analysis |
ISBN | : |
"Pursuant to Executive Order 11423, 33 Fed. Reg. 11714 (Aug. 16, 1968), as amended, and Executive Order 13337, 69 Fed. Reg. 25229 (Apr. 30, 2004), TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, L.P. ("Keystone") hereby submits its application to the United States Department of State ("Department") for a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, operation, and maintenance of certain pipeline facilities for the importation of crude oil, to be located at the international border between the United States and Canada, at Phillips County, Montana (the "border crossing facilities"), as more fully described herein."--Page 1.
Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Keystone XL Project
Author | : Alexander Yuan |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 400 |
Release | : 2011 |
Genre | : Environmental impact statements |
ISBN | : |
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has issued for public review and comment the supplemental draft environmental impact statement (SDEIS) for the Keystone XL Project. The proposed action is to construct and operate a crude oil pipeline and related facilities at the international border and continuing into the United States to transport Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) crude oil and other crude oils to a proposed tank farm in Cushing, Oklahoma, and to delivery points in the Port Arthur and east Houston areas of Texas. The proposed pipeline would traverse Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas, with localized facilities constructed on an existing segment of pipeline in Kansas.
Keystone XL Pipeline Project Compliance Follow-Up Review
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 35 |
Release | : 2014-03-27 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : 9781457853685 |
The Keystone XL project is a proposed 875-mile pipeline from Alberta, Canada, through Montana and South Dakota to Nebraska, where it would link with pipelines running to the U.S. Gulf Coast. It is to be built and operated by TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP (TransCanada), an entity controlled by TransCanada Corp., a Canada-based energy company. On Sept. 19, 2008, TransCanada submitted a Presidential permit application to the Dept. of State (State) because Keystone XL crosses the U.S.- Canadian border into Montana. Following President Obama's Jan. 2012 denial, TransCanada filed a new Keystone XL permit application in May 2012. A supplemental EIS (SEIS) was required because the route through Nebraska proposed by TransCanada had changed, so State needed to select an EIS contractor to help prepare the SEIS. In May 2012, State selected Environmental Resources Management, Inc. (ERM). In March 2013, State issued a draft SEIS for Keystone XL. Thereafter, State received a number of complaints asserting that ERM and its staff lacked the requisite independence to serve as the SEIS contractor and that ERM's answers in the conflict of interest questionnaire submitted as part of the SEIS contractor selection process were not accurate. In response, State initiated this follow-up review to determine how well the process used to select ERM followed prescribed guidance and to determine how effective the revised process was in assessing and addressing organizational conflicts of interest for third-party contractors. This is a print on demand report.
TransCanada Keystone XL Pipeline Project
Author | : exp Energy Services, Inc |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : |
Release | : 2012 |
Genre | : Environmental impact analysis |
ISBN | : |
TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP (Keystone) submits this Environmental Report to the Department of State (DOS) in support of its May 4, 2012 application for a Presidential Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline Project (Project). The Environmental Report provides an update of the environmental impacts of the Project since the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the original Keystone XL Project was published August 2011.
Keystone XL Pipeline Project
Author | : |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 24 |
Release | : 2011 |
Genre | : Environmental impact analysis |
ISBN | : |
Keystone XL Pipeline
Author | : United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 6 |
Release | : 2014 |
Genre | : Petroleum pipelines |
ISBN | : |
Crs Report for Congress
Author | : Paul W. Parfomak |
Publisher | : BiblioGov |
Total Pages | : 46 |
Release | : 2013-10 |
Genre | : |
ISBN | : 9781294028178 |
In May 2012, Canadian pipeline company TransCanada reapplied to the U.S. Department of State for a Presidential Permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline. The pipeline would transport crude oil from the oil sands region of Alberta, Canada, to the existing Keystone Pipeline System in Nebraska. It also could accept U.S. crude from the Bakken oil fields in Montana and North Dakota. A second segment of the Keystone XL pipeline system, the Gulf Coast Project, is proceeding separately to connect existing pipeline facilities in Oklahoma to refineries in Texas. When completed, the entire Keystone XL pipeline system would ultimately have capacity to transport 830,000 barrels of crude oil per day to U.S. market hubs. TransCanada submitted the May 2012 permit application after its 2008 Keystone XL permit application was denied. The State Department has jurisdiction over the Keystone XL pipeline's approval because it would cross the U.S. border. Before it can approve such a permit, the department must determine that the project is in the "national interest," accounting for potential effects on the environment, economy, energy security, and foreign policy, among other factors. Environmental impacts are considered under the National Environmental Policy Act, as documented in an Environmental Impact Statement ...