San Diego Bay

San Diego Bay
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 520
Release: 1989
Genre: San Diego Bay (Calif.)
ISBN:

Arsenic in Drinking Water

Arsenic in Drinking Water
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Total Pages: 241
Release: 2001-11-26
Genre: Nature
ISBN: 0309170435

Having safe drinking water is important to all Americans. The Environmental Protection Agency's decision in the summer of 2001 to delay implementing a new, more stringent standard for the maximum allowable level for arsenic in drinking water generated a great deal of criticism and controversy. Ultimately at issue were newer data on arsenic beyond those that had been examined in a 1999 National Research Council report. EPA asked the National Research Council for an evaluation of the new data available. The committee's analyses and conclusions are presented in Arsenic in Drinking Water: 2001 Update. New epidemiological studies are critically evaluated, as are new experimental data that provide information on how and at what level arsenic in drinking water can lead to cancer. The report's findings are consistent with those of the 1999 report that found high risks of cancer at the previous federal standard of 50 parts per billion. In fact, the new report concludes that men and women who consume water containing 3 parts per billion of arsenic daily have about a 1 in 1,000 increased risk of developing bladder or lung cancer during their lifetime.

A Risk Assessment for Ingestion of Toxic Chemicals in Fish from Imperial Beach, California

A Risk Assessment for Ingestion of Toxic Chemicals in Fish from Imperial Beach, California
Author: Mallory Arden Lushenko
Publisher:
Total Pages: 199
Release: 2010
Genre:
ISBN:

Contamination of fish by heavy metals, chlorinated pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can compromise the health of recreational and subsistence anglers consuming the fish they catch. This investigation quantified chemical contaminants in fish muscle and liver tissue samples and followed methods of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to estimate the hazard indexes and cancer risks associated with consuming fish caught in the waters off the Imperial Beach Pier in Imperial Beach, California. Similar risk assessment studies have been performed for other areas of Southern California but no such investigations have been undertaken for Imperial Beach. All fish samples were donated by Imperial Beach Pier anglers participating in a fishing derby on August 30, 2008. A total of 8 fish samples (3 jacksmelt, 3 mackerel, 1 yellowfin croaker, 1 white croaker) were collected and frozen until they were transported to CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. for analysis of chemical contaminants. Different instrumentation, per the U.S. EPA methodologies, was used for the specific analytes. A mean ingestion value of 31.2 g/day and a subsistence ingestion value of 142.2 g/day were used along with the mean and maximum concentrations, respectively, to estimate the risk values for each chemical contaminant in muscle tissue. The level of exposure resulting from the consumption of each chemical in the fish tissue was estimated in an average daily dose equation. For noncarcinogenic chemicals, the average daily dose was divided by the oral reference dose, as specified by the U.S. EPA, for each chemical to estimate the hazard index. Estimation of risk for carcinogenic chemicals was calculated by multiplying the average daily dose by the cancer potency factor, also designated by the U.S. EPA. Hazard indexes were calculated for organic arsenic, cadmium, chromium (VI), methylmercury, nickel, selenium, and zinc while cancer risk calculations were done for total chlordane, total DDT, individual PCB congeners detected, and total PCBs. All noncarcinogenic chemicals yielded hazard index (HI) values below 1.0, with the exception of mean and subsistence level ingestion of organic arsenic, with HI values of 1.031 and 8.103, respectively, and subsistence level ingestion of methylmercury, which had a HI of 1.424. Cancer risk calculations exceeding the U.S. EPA's acceptable risk level of 1 in 1,000,000 (or 10-6) included total chlordane at the subsistence level ingestion (1.780 x 10-6), total DDT at the mean ingestion level (7.184 x 10-6), and each PCB congener at the subsistence ingestion level (2.034 x 10-6). Inorganic arsenic at mean and subsistence ingestion levels (5.154 x 10-5 and 4.053 x 10-4, respectively), total DDT at the subsistence ingestion level (7.538 x 10-5), and total PCBs at mean and subsistence ingestion levels (1.159 x 10-5 and 5.290 x 10-5, respectively) all exceeded the U.S. EPA acceptable cancer risk as well as the California EPA's less stringent acceptable risk level of 1 in 100,000 (or 10-5). Regarding the risks of fish liver tissue consumption, the mean mass of the livers collected was 2.48 g and an assumption was made that 3 fish livers of this mass were consumed per week, yielding a mean daily intake value of 1.06 g/day. The presence of metals was not analyzed in liver tissue samples, thus only cancer risk calculations for detected chlorinated pesticides and PCB congeners were performed using the arithmetic mean chemical concentration found in the samples. Of all carcinogenic chemicals detected in the liver samples, only the total PCBs concentration yielded a cancer risk exceeding the U.S. EPA acceptable risk level, with a risk value of 2.804 x 10-6. Some of the chemicals studied, such as arsenic and mercury, occur naturally in the environment and present a "natural" risk because of their behavior in the marine environment. Due to their ban in the U.S. and decreased use in Mexico, the concentrations of the "legacy" pollutants, such as DDT andPCBs, should continue to decline to within de minimus levels over the next decade or two. The results of this study have shown that some of the chemicals analyzed exert a marginal level of unacceptable risk at present, particularly when consumed at subsistence levels; thus, it is important that continued research be conducted to better establish fish consumption data and to aid in the creation of accurate fish consumption guidelines for anglers on the Imperial Beach Pier.

Arsenic in Drinking Water

Arsenic in Drinking Water
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Total Pages: 242
Release: 2001-12-26
Genre: Nature
ISBN: 0309076293

Having safe drinking water is important to all Americans. The Environmental Protection Agency's decision in the summer of 2001 to delay implementing a new, more stringent standard for the maximum allowable level for arsenic in drinking water generated a great deal of criticism and controversy. Ultimately at issue were newer data on arsenic beyond those that had been examined in a 1999 National Research Council report. EPA asked the National Research Council for an evaluation of the new data available. The committee's analyses and conclusions are presented in Arsenic in Drinking Water: 2001 Update. New epidemiological studies are critically evaluated, as are new experimental data that provide information on how and at what level arsenic in drinking water can lead to cancer. The report's findings are consistent with those of the 1999 report that found high risks of cancer at the previous federal standard of 50 parts per billion. In fact, the new report concludes that men and women who consume water containing 3 parts per billion of arsenic daily have about a 1 in 1,000 increased risk of developing bladder or lung cancer during their lifetime.

Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Fish from Laguna de Bay

Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Fish from Laguna de Bay
Author: Victorio Molina
Publisher: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Total Pages: 116
Release: 2012-05
Genre:
ISBN: 9783659112812

This book provides an assessment of the risks to human health associated with consumption of fish from Laguna de Bay. Fish samples of bangus, bighead carp, dalag, kanduli, and tilapia collected during the wet and dry seasons were analyzed for cadmium, lead, mercury, arsenic, and chromium. Estimates of health risks were summarized according to non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health effects. Non-carcinogenic Hazard Quotient values of five heavy metals showed that lead is the most urgent pollutant of concern from all sampling locations in the lake. Elevated health risk for mercury was also evident in the west and central bay particularly for dalag and kanduli species. Among the five heavy metals only arsenic is a confirmed human carcinogen through the oral route of exposure. The highest life time cancer risk for arsenic was computed for tilapia from sampling station 2B (dry season) with risk value of 8.5E-04 or an excess of 85 cancer cases per 100,000 population. From the point of view of human health protection, fish products from the lake particularly bangus, bighead carp, dalag, kanduli and tilapia are not fit for long-term human consumption.

Arsenic in Groundwater

Arsenic in Groundwater
Author: M. Manzurul Hassan
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2015-03-15
Genre: Science
ISBN: 9781780400204

The main focus of Arsenic in Groundwater: Poisoning and Risk Assessment is to explore the untold stories of groundwater arsenic in view of its poisonous nature for human health, social implications, exposure and risk assessment, worldwide concentrations with space-time dimension, micro level GIS application in spatial arsenic concentration, policy response and mitigation options, and water right and legal issues of safe drinking water. There are very few books on arsenic issues and almost all the books are mainly based on geology, geochemistry and health issues. There is a gap in spatial, social and legal issues of arsenic toxicity, and the lack of literature on GIS-based modeling for spatial risk of arsenic contamination is a serious methodological limitation. Therefore, this book is a departure for health geography with a social science and legal context. The book deals with the arsenic issue within a social science point framework, with the context being set by environmental and legal considerations. Due consideration is given to the methodological issues of spatial, quantitative and qualitative enquiries on arsenic poisoning, for instance using GIS to investigate the distribution of arsenic-laced water in space-time to uncover the pattern of variations over scales from metres to kilometres. The production of spatial risk maps provides an indication to researchers, policy makers, and politicians of possible long-term strategies of mitigation. Qualitative methodological approaches uncover the hidden issues of arsenic poisoning on human health and their social implications as well as their coping strategies and adaptation in the face of community and in-family ostracism. Authors M. Manzurul Hassan, University of Durham, UK; Peter J. Atkins, University of Durham, UK Manzurul Hassan is Professor of Geography and Environment, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. His research interests include the groundwater arsenic poisoning; medical waste management; and water supply and sanitation. He has written 70 research papers/chapters in peer-reviewed journals, including 15 on arsenic poisoning. He has a wide range of consulting experience in groundwater arsenic poisoning, medical waste management, and water supply and sanitation. He is at present a Commonwealth Fellow in the Institute of Hazard and Risk Research (IHRR), Department of Geography, University of Durham, United Kingdom. Peter Atkins is Professor of Geography at the University of Durham. His research interests include the history and geography of food and drink, with particular reference to health outcomes and policy-making. He is also experienced in Bangladesh environmental issues. He is the author of 8 books and 80 articles in peer-reviewed journals, including 11 on arsenic contamination in Bangladesh. Table of Contents Introduction. Worldwide Distribution of Groundwater Arsenic Poisoning. Spatial Arsenic Concentrations and Mapping. Arsenic and Health Impact: People's Experience and Adapting Strategy. Arsenic and Risk Assessment: Spatial Investigation and Dose-Response Analysis. Social Implications of Arsenic Poisoning: A Qualitative Enquiry. Policy Response and Arsenic Mitigation. Environmental Justice and Legal Issues of Drinking Water. Summary and Conclusion. Arsenic in Groundwater: Poisoning and Risk Assessment is co-published with CRC Press