Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections

Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections
Author: Raghavan Srinivasan
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
Total Pages: 48
Release: 2011
Genre: Technology & Engineering
ISBN: 0309213452

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 705: Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections explores crash modification factors (CMFs) for safety strategies at signalized intersections. CMFs are a tool for quickly estimating the impact of safety improvements.

Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections

Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections
Author: Raghavan Srinivasan (Transportation engineer)
Publisher:
Total Pages: 38
Release: 2011
Genre:
ISBN:

"TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 705: Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections explores crash modification factors (CMFs) for safety strategies at signalized intersections. CMFs are a tool for quickly estimating the impact of safety improvements"--Publisher's description.

Development of a Safety Evaluation Procedure for Identifying High-risk Signalized Intersections in the Virginia Department of Transportation's Northern Virginia District

Development of a Safety Evaluation Procedure for Identifying High-risk Signalized Intersections in the Virginia Department of Transportation's Northern Virginia District
Author: Young-Jun Kweon
Publisher:
Total Pages: 86
Release: 2007
Genre: Roads
ISBN:

This research was undertaken to develop an evaluation procedure to identify high-risk four-legged signalized intersections in VDOT's Northern Virginia district by traffic movements and times of day. By using the developed procedure, traffic engineers are expected to be able to identify signalized intersections where the traffic crash occurrences under different traffic conditions for different times of day are more frequent than would normally be expected. Using generalized linear models such as negative binomial models, one safety performance function was estimated for each of nine crash population reference groups formed by three traffic crash patterns (crash patterns 1, 4, and 6) and four times of day (A.M. peak, mid day, P.M. peak, and evening off peak). Crash pattern 1 is a same-direction crash (rear-end, sideswipe or angle crash) that occurs after exiting the intersection; crash pattern 4 is a right-angle crash between two adjacent straight-through vehicle movements in the intersection; and crash pattern 6 is an angle or head-on or opposite sideswipe crash between a straight-through vehicle movement and an opposing left-turn vehicle movement in the intersection. The procedure developed in this study is based on the empirical Bayes (EB) method. Additional data do not need to be collected in order to use the EB procedure because all the data required for applying the EB procedure should be obtainable from VDOT's crash database and from Synchro input data that are already available to traffic engineers for traffic signal phase plans. Thus, the EB procedure is cost-effective and readily applicable. For easy application of the EB procedure, an EB spreadsheet was developed using Microsoft Excel, and a users' guide was prepared. These are available from the author upon request.

Safety Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Arrow at Signalized Intersections

Safety Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Arrow at Signalized Intersections
Author: Raghavan Srinivasan (Transportation engineer)
Publisher:
Total Pages: 54
Release: 2020
Genre: Electronic traffic controls
ISBN:

This study evaluated the safety effect of the flashing yellow arrow (FYA) treatment at signalized intersections. The major objective of this strategy is to reduce the frequency of left-turn (LT) crashes, especially those that involve a collision between left turns and vehicles traveling straight through from the opposite direction. The project team conducted an empirical Bayes before-after analysis of installations in Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Oregon. The treatments were divided into seven categories depending on the phasing system in the before and after periods, number of roads where FYAs were implemented, and number of legs at each intersection. The first five categories involved permissive or protected-permissive phasing in the before period. Intersections in these five treatment categories experienced a reduction in the primary target crashes under consideration: LT crashes and left-turn-with-opposing-through (LTOT) crashes at the intersection level. The reduction ranged from 15 to 50 percent depending on the treatment category. Intersections in categories 6 and 7 had at least one protected LT phase in the before period, and after phasing had an FYA protected-permissive LT phase without time-of-day operation (category 6) and with time-of-day operation (category 7). Consistent with results from previous studies, these intersections experienced an increase in LT and LTOT crashes. The B/C ratios for categories 1-5 ranged from 56:1 to 144:1.

Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections

Safety Evaluation of Corner Clearance at Signalized Intersections
Author: Thanh Le
Publisher:
Total Pages: 50
Release: 2018
Genre: Roads
ISBN:

This study evaluates corner clearance at signalized intersections under the Development of Crash Modification Factors program for the Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study. Geometric, traffic, and crash data were obtained for signalized intersections with various corner clearances from the State of California and the City of Charlotte, North Carolina. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of corner clearance while controlling for other differences among study sites. The estimated CMFs indicated that more limited clearance (i.e., driveway(s) within 50 ft of the signalized intersection) on receiving corners was associated with increases for all crash types, based on the data included in this analysis. These increases were statistically significant at the 90-percent level or greater for total, fatal and injury, rear-end, sideswipe, right-angle, and nighttime crashes. Only the results for turning crashes were not statistically significant at the 90-percent level. For limited corner clearance on the approach corners, the results indicated statistically significant reductions in total, fatal and injury, and rear-end crashes. The results also indicated reductions in sideswipe and nighttime crashes, and increases in right-angle and turning crashes, but none of these results were statistically significant at the 90-percent level.

Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections

Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 1964
Genre: Highway research
ISBN: 9780309213455

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 705: Evaluation of Safety Strategies at Signalized Intersections explores crash modification factors (CMFs) for safety strategies at signalized intersections. CMFs are a tool for quickly estimating the impact of safety improvements.