Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Evaluation

Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Evaluation
Author: Gerald J. Stahler
Publisher: Academic Press
Total Pages: 414
Release: 2013-10-22
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 1483276503

Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Evaluation is a collection of papers that provides a broad range of ideas, methods, and techniques in program administration and evaluation in the field of mental health. The book is organized into 2 sections. Part I, consisting of 8 chapters, presents the necessary evaluation strategies and approaches that effectively address the important mental health issues for the 1980s such as prevention programs; the linking of health and mental health delivery systems; accountability in assuring quality of services; deinstitutionalizing the chronically mentally ill; and providing for greater local participation in mental health program management. Part II, surveys the promising evaluation methods, approaches, and relevant issues that are emerging in the new organizational and political environment of the mental health system. The book will be of good use to mental health administrators, researchers, managers, students, and evaluators.

Health Psychology

Health Psychology
Author: Richard O. Straub
Publisher: Macmillan
Total Pages: 842
Release: 2002
Genre: Health & Fitness
ISBN: 9781572597860

New text explores the psychology behind health and illness. Emphasis on hot topics, critical-thinking and real-world applications; attractive two-color design; and complete ancillary package.

Methods for Evaluating Health Services

Methods for Evaluating Health Services
Author: Paul M. Wortman
Publisher: SAGE Publications, Incorporated
Total Pages: 152
Release: 1981
Genre: Medical
ISBN:

Deals with the problems of evaluating new medical developments for scientific soundness, safety, and effectiveness. The contributors establish a conceptual framework for such evaluation and discuss the practical difficulties of implementing it. Are random, controlled experiments really preferable to less expensive trials using historical controls? How can patients be brought into the evaluation process?