When the Booker Prize Committee decided to institute a special Booker Russian Novel Prize, there were no other literary prizes in the post-perestroika Russia, the official Soviet prizes for literature having been abolished shortly after the collapse of communism, when most state-subsidized publishing also closed down. This left Russian authors with little choice but to flee abroad in search of employment and publishers, while most of those who stayed declared that the end of Russian literature had arrived, and set about dividing up the property of the Writer's Union among themselves. Authors, who earlier had not been published for political reasons, now were not published for economic reasons. But Russian literature did not die. It went through a period of crisis--together with the rest of the country--and gradually began to recover, bringing forth of profusion of styles and a new freshness of vision. Into the atmosphere of confusion reigning in literary circles, and the overall public indifference to literary developments, the Booker Prize came like Santa Claus, offering not only a substantial money prize (which after all can only be awarded to one writer each year) but an exciting literary race which generated much needed publicity for everyone involved. In spite of mutterings from the nationalistically minded that Russian writers should be ashamed of themselves for accepting money from abroad, the excitement generated by the Booker Prize spread like wildfire, with heated debate breaking out in the press and among critics and readers alike. Passions ran high, and public interest in literature was markedly boosted. Perhaps, however, the greatest achievement of the Booker Prize to date is the fact that it has inspired a number of Russia's new rich to institute national prizes themselves. Let us hope that this process of revealing new talent and giving publicity to short-listed authors will ultimately lead to change in the publishing business in Russia. Russian publishers currently focus on translated literature, which the Russian public was starved of under the Communists and which, naturally, excites much interest today. They are not at present in any great hurry to publish new Russian authors. The time will come, however, when Russia's readers will want to know what has been happening in their own culture all this time, and at that moment they will be particularly appreciative of all the present efforts to preserve Russian culture which, in the past, has given the world so many outstanding writers. True to our commitment to acquaint publishers and readers with the winners of the Booker Russian Novel Prize, we offer excerpts from the short-listed novels of 1994 with comments by the chairman of that year's jury, Lev Anninsky. All the excerpts selected read like complete stories and so can be enjoyed by the specialist and the general reader alike. As in previous years the Booker Prize spotlighted nearly all the outstanding novels published in the preceding year, and simply by showing a sustained interest in the Russian novel it encouraged authors to turn back to this genre from the short story and non-fiction which had been dominating Russian writing in the past few turbulent years. The third year of the Booker Games produced another rich display of varied and well-written works. There is no doubt that in the country of Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky the standard of creative writing has never fallen. Now that most of the previously banned works have been published we can see that in each decade of this century at least a dozen excellent authors were actively writing, even though they could not always publish their works officially. The 1994 short list (as well as the long list) has shown up several definite trends in themes and styles. Writers are trying to take a fresh look at Russia's past from the vantage point of the present day and with the new knowledge that has come to light in recent years (Okudzhava, Dolinyak, Levitin, Buida). They enjoy delving into formerly forbidden subjects such as religion, sex, the subconscious, crime (Slapovsky, Aleshkovsky, Eppel, Klimontovich, Galperin). Biographies and autobiographies, mainly re-appraisals of the past, are very popular. There is much experimentation in style and form. Each year new literary discoveries from previous decades are still being made, works that for various reasons, but mainly because of their unorthodox nature, have remained unpublished to this day. Suffice it to recall that the present collection opens with a story by the first Russian Booker Prize winner, Mark Kharitonov, which was written in 1975 but published only in 1994; or take Asar Eppel who has been writing fiction all his life but only recently been able to publish some of it, instantly gaining a national reputation; or two outstanding poets, Georgy Mark and Genrikh Sapgir, whose long overdue fame came to them only in their later years. There is every reason to suppose that the full history of Russian literature had not yet been written, not all its treasures have been retrieved from the obscurity of the archives, and we can still look forward to exciting new surprises. Vladimir Makanin's "The Captive of the Caucus," which gives this collection its name, is one vivid example of the illusory nature of man's freedom. We are all in some sense captives: captives of a political system, of circumstances, of our obligations or our illusions, to say nothing of those who are captives in a literal sense. The world seems to be full of misplaced people trapped in captivity of one kind or another, sometimes self-imposed, but feeling nonetheless alienated from the hostile world around them. In Makanin's novella the invaders find that they are the captives of the country they have conquered. In Victor Pelevin's "Tambourine for the Upper World" enterprising girls resuscitate corpses from the battlefields of WW II so as to marry them and get themselves out of Russia. Emigres too are eternal captives of their former homeland and their Soviet past, their loyalties torn between a Russia they are losing touch with and the land that gave them asylum but where they are unable to strike roots (Zinovy Zinik's "The Moth," Vassily Aksyonov's "Palmer's First Flight"). Georgy Vladimov, winner of the 1995 Booker Russian Novel Prize, features a decent Second Word War army commander caught in a web of intrigue, with all his subordinates spying on him for the army's secret police ("A General and his Army"). Oleg Pavlov, recently released from the army, depicts a platoon guarding a present-day prison camp where the convicts and the guards are both equally prisoners of the huge, merciless state machinery ("An Official Tale"). Yevgeny Fyodorov, who spent many years in Stalinist gulags, describes his personal experiences in surviving and preserving his sanity in "Odyssey." Alexander Terekhov sets his novel "The Rat-killer" in post-perestroika provincial Russia where not much has changed for the little man and totalitarian rule effortlessly prevails. Mark Shatunovsky depicts a man and a woman locked into their private lives and not venturing out into a warring world they are little interested in. Despite the unifying theme the aim of this, as of the other issues of Glas, is to present contemporary Russian literature as it happens. Traditionally we have offered excerpts from the novels short-listed for the Booker Russian Novel Prize to give publishers abroad an opportunity of acquainting themselves with what Russian critics have considered the best novels of the previous year. In his notes Stanislav Rassadin, Chairman of the jury of last year's Booker Russian Novel Prize, shares his thoughts on the current state of Russian writing.