Scientists, Engineers, and Track-Two Diplomacy

Scientists, Engineers, and Track-Two Diplomacy
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Total Pages: 167
Release: 2004-03-02
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 0309090938

This report is intended to provide a brief historical perspective of the evolution of the interacademy program during the past half-century, recognizing that many legacies of the Soviet era continue to influence government approaches in Moscow and Washington and to shape the attitudes of researchers toward bilateral cooperation in both countries (of special interest is the changing character of the program during the age of perestroika (restructuring) in the late 1980s in the Soviet Union); to describe in some detail the significant interacademy activities from late 1991, when the Soviet Union fragmented, to mid-2003; and to set forth lessons learned about the benefits and limitations of interacademy cooperation and to highlight approaches that have been successful in overcoming difficulties of implementation.

U.S.-U.S.S.R. Cooperative Agreements

U.S.-U.S.S.R. Cooperative Agreements
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics. Subcommittee on International Cooperation in Science and Space
Publisher:
Total Pages: 36
Release: 1972
Genre: Exchange of publications
ISBN:

U.S. Government Funding for Science and Technology Cooperation with Russia

U.S. Government Funding for Science and Technology Cooperation with Russia
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2002
Genre:
ISBN:

The United States government spent, on average, $350 million a year in the 1990s to support science and technology (S & T) cooperation with Russia. The amount rose in the early 1990s, peaked in 1996, and then began dropping in the late 1990s. When aggregated by dollars spent, the areas most likely to be the subject of cooperation are aerospace and aeronautical projects, engineering research, energy, and earth sciences. When counted by the number of projects (rather than funds committed), earth sciences-including geology, ocean studies, and atmospheric sciences-account for the largest number. Earlier RAND studies suggested that, during the mid-1990s, cooperation with Russia claimed more government research and development (R & D) dollars than any other country. In order to examine the relationship in more detail, RAND collected and analyzed data at the project level and surveyed agency officials about specific projects and programs. These data were aggregated into categories created by RAND. This report provides an analytic, cross-agency overview, presenting a broad picture of the U.S.-Russia S & T relationship between 1994 and 1999.