Evidence on Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and Networks in the Export Performance of Firms

Evidence on Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and Networks in the Export Performance of Firms
Author: Mr.Luca Antonio Ricci
Publisher: International Monetary Fund
Total Pages: 44
Release: 2011-04-01
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 1455227021

This paper tests the effect of comparative advantage, size, and networking on the firm probability of exporting. The closest theoretical framework is the one of Bernard, Redding, and Schott (2007), with firm heterogeneity across countries and industries. We use a recently assembled multi-country multi-industry firm level dataset, and construct original measures of comparative advantage. The results show that firms are more likely to export if they belong to the comparative advantage industry, if they enjoy a higher productivity, or if they benefit from foreign, domestic, or communication networks.

exports and productivity-comparable evidence for 14 countries

exports and productivity-comparable evidence for 14 countries
Author: Leonhard Pertl
Publisher: World Bank Publications
Total Pages: 82
Release: 2007
Genre: Buyers
ISBN:

Abstract: The authors use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. The overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: Exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity are controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is strong evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. The authors document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of their results the authors find that countries that are more open and have more effective government report higher productivity premia. However, the level of development per se does not appear to be an explanation for the observed cross-country differences.

Exports and Productivity ??? Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries

Exports and Productivity ??? Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries
Author: The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2012
Genre:
ISBN:

The authors use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. The overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: Exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity are controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is strong evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. The authors document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of their results the authors find that countries that are more open and have more effective government report higher productivity premia. However, the level of development per se does not appear to be an explanation for the observed cross-country differences.

The Relationship Between Export Status and Productivity in Services

The Relationship Between Export Status and Productivity in Services
Author: Asier Minondo
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2015
Genre:
ISBN:

This paper analyses the relationship between export status and productivity in a major service exporter, Spain, during 2001-07. I find that exporters in the services sector are 45 percent more productive than non-exporters. This productivity premium is larger for firms that supply non-internet-related services than for firms that supply internet-related services. The results show that exporters were more productive than non-exporters before beginning to export, and also that exporting increases productivity growth; however, this positive shock vanishes quickly.

Microeconometric Studies of Firms' Imports and Exports

Microeconometric Studies of Firms' Imports and Exports
Author: Joachim Wagner
Publisher: World Scientific Publishing Europe Limited
Total Pages: 464
Release: 2021
Genre: Exports
ISBN: 9781786349682

Microeconometric Studies of Firms' Imports and Exports spans twenty-four papers with a focus on four topics: applications of advanced microeconometric methods for cross-section and panel data of internationally active firms; cross-country studies using comparable data for firms; studies of exports by business services firms; and new evidence on German firms' trade in goods from transaction data. Applications focus on Germany, the third-largest exporter and importer of goods in the world. Some of these papers are "classic" empirical studies that helped to shape the field of microeconometrics in international trade and are widely cited. The two final papers are hitherto unpublished and include new material. Applications focus on Germany, the third-largest exporter and importer of goods in the world.

Does Freer Trade Really Lead to Productivity Growth?

Does Freer Trade Really Lead to Productivity Growth?
Author: Lauren Bresnahan
Publisher: Intl Food Policy Res Inst
Total Pages: 28
Release: 2013-04-17
Genre: Social Science
ISBN:

Manufacturing is intensive in the use of reproducible factors and exhibits greater technological dynamism than primary production. As such, its growth is central to long-run development in low-income countries. African countries are latecomers to industrialization, and barriers to manufacturing growth, including those that limit trade, have been slow to come down. What factors contribute most to increases in output and productivity growth in African manufacturing? Recent trade–industrial organization theory suggests that trade liberalization should raise average total factor productivity (TFP) among manufacturing firms (Melitz 2003). However, these predictions are conditional on maintained assumptions about the nature of industries, factor markets, and trade patterns that may not be appropriate in a developing-country setting. Manufacturing firms are heterogeneous, so the analysis demands disaggregated data. We use firm-level data from the World Bank’s Regional Program on Enterprise Development, covering Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania for 1991–2003. Among other things, the data distinguish exports by destination (Africa and the rest of the world), which is important due to the spread of intra-African regional trade agreements (RTAs). Econometric results confirm well-known relationships, such as a positive association between export intensity and TFP, which implies that more productive firms are more likely to select in to exporting. However, we also find the destination of exports to be important. Many exporters have experienced declining TFP growth rates, which have occurred at different rates depending on the country and the export destination. The evidence for “learning by exporting” is thus mixed. These results add a new dimension to controversies over the development implications of trade liberalization and the promotion of intra-African RTAs.

Exports, Productivity and Capital Intensity

Exports, Productivity and Capital Intensity
Author: Dieison Casagrande
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2023
Genre:
ISBN:

Start export is important for firm's performance and efficiency gains. This paper explores the export-productivity and export-capital intensity relationship using firm-level data from Brazilian manufacturing industry over the 2007-2014 period. The empirical strategy combine Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Differences in Differences (DiD) methods and explores the fact that firms enter at different moments into the external market, generating a variation in the period and permanence in international trade. Our results evidence learning effects and the use of comparative advantages. Firms that start export have an instantaneous productivity growth around 5% in relation to the pre-entry period compared to non-exporting firms. The permanence in the activity intensifies these effects. After five periods, the growth (reduction) in productivity (capital intensity) is approximately 15% (5%). We find heterogeneous effects, so that the magnitude of effects varies in dimensions such as size, technological intensity and pre-entry levels of productivity and capital intensity.