On the constitutionality of a national bank

On the constitutionality of a national bank
Author: Alexander Hamilton
Publisher: DigiCat
Total Pages: 45
Release: 2022-09-15
Genre: Law
ISBN:

Alexander Hamilton was an American revolutionary, statesman, and Founding Father of the United States. In this report of 1791, he advocated a national bank called the Bank of the United States, modeled after the Bank of England. Hamilton believed that a national bank was required to stabilize and improve the nation's credit and to improve the financial order, clarity, and precedence of the United States government under the newly legislated Constitution.

Opinion As to the Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States

Opinion As to the Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States
Author: Alexander Hamilton
Publisher: ReadHowYouWant.com
Total Pages: 86
Release: 2006
Genre: Law
ISBN: 1425029531

A wonderful piece in which Hamilton defends the constitutionality of the National Bank of America. Written in 1791, it is addressed to the then American president George Washington. It stresses the economic benefits emerging from establishment of the bank. He wrote it in response to the questions raised by Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, regarding the legality of the issue. Informative!

Redefining Federalism

Redefining Federalism
Author: Douglas T. Kendall
Publisher: Environmental Law Institute
Total Pages: 175
Release: 2004
Genre: Central-local government relations
ISBN: 1585760862

If federalism is about protecting the states, why not listen to them? In the last decade, the Supreme Court has reworked significant areas of constitutional law with the professed purpose of protecting the dignity and authority of the states, while frequently disregarding the states'' views as to what federalism is all about. The Court, according to the states, is protecting federalism too much and too little. Too much, in striking down federal law where even the states recognize that a federal role is necessary to address a national problem. Too little, in inappropriately limiting state experimentation. By listening more carefully to the States, the Supreme Court could transform its federalism jurisprudence from a source of criticism and polarization to a doctrine that should win broad support from across the political spectrum. In this important book, six distinguished authors redefine federalism and reaffirm Justice Louis Brandeis's vision of states and localities as the laboratories of democracy.