Final Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Globalization and Security

Final Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Globalization and Security
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Globalization and Security
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 163
Release: 1999
Genre: Globalization
ISBN: 1428981217

Globalization-the integration of the political, economic and cultural activities of geographically and/or nationally separated peoples-is not a discernible event or challenge, is not new, but it is accelerating. More importantly, globalization is largely irresistible. Thus, globalization is not a policy option, but a fact to which policymakers must adapt. Globalization has accelerated as a result of many positive factors, the most notable of which include: the collapse of communism and the end of the Cold War; the spread of capitalism and free trade; more rapid and global capital flows and more liberal financial markets; the liberalization of communications; international academic and scientific collaboration; and faster and more efficient forms of transportation. At the core of accelerated global integration-at once its principal cause and consequence-is the information revolution, which is knocking down once-formidable barriers of physical distance, blurring national boundaries and creating cross-border communities of all types.

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Human Resources Strategy

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Human Resources Strategy
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Human Resources Strategy
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 142
Release: 2000
Genre: United States
ISBN: 1428981004

The Department of Defense (DoD) employs more than three million people. Nearly half of its personnel, 1.44 million, are active duty military. About 870,000 Reservists, composed of 410,000 Selected Reservists and 460,000 National Guard personnel, add to the active duty force. Civilian personnel make up the remaining workforce, numbering about 730,000. These three million employees are supported by an array of defense contractors providing a wide variety of goods and services to the Department. Moreover, the Department spends more than half of its $270 billion budget on pay and allowances alone. With a workforce this large, varied, diverse, and important, it is not surprising that its management is a uniquely challenging undertaking. The human resource challenges facing DoD have changed rapidly over the last decade as a result of many factors. A robust economy, civilian sector competition for employees to fill high-technology positions, declining American public interest in public service, major changes in the Department's missions and operational tempo, and a significant downsizing of the Department's workforce are a few examples. Reducing the size of the overall workforce by more than a million personnel, from a high in 1987 of 4.1 million, has left in place a very different force distribution - in age, education, and skill.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Training Superiority & Training Surprise

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Training Superiority & Training Surprise
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 41
Release: 2001
Genre: Military art and science
ISBN: 1428980911

In late 1998 the Undersecretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), the Director, Defense Research and Engineering, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff requested the Defense Science Board to create a task force on training and education. The task force met periodically throughout 1999 and 2000. This document is the report of our deliberations.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Technology Capabilities of Non-DoD Providers

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Technology Capabilities of Non-DoD Providers
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 106
Release: 2000
Genre:
ISBN: 1428981063

This report is a product of the Defense Science Board (DSB). The DSB is a Federal Advisory Committee established to provide independent advice to the Secretary of Defense. Statements, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations in this report do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Defense. Attached is the report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Capabilities of Non-DoD Providers of Science and Technology, Systems Engineering and Test and Evaluation. This Study was requested by the Under Secretary of Defense (AT & L) in the Fall of 1998. The Terms of deterence directed that the Task Force make recommendations on: Non-DoD sources of Science and Technology and Systems Engineering - Processes tor out-sourcing of Science and Technology and System Engineering.

Report of the 1998 Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on DoD Warfighting Transformation

Report of the 1998 Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on DoD Warfighting Transformation
Author: United States. Defense Science Board
Publisher:
Total Pages: 36
Release: 1999
Genre: Military planning
ISBN:

The Defense Science Board (DSB) Warfighting Transformation Task Force was charged with reviewing the transformation activities underway in the Department of Defense (DoD) to: * provide an independent, comprehensive picture of transformation efforts that encompasses processes, organizational responsibilities, and anticipated products; * identify opportunities to enhance, as well as the obstacles to, transformation progress; and * recommend Criteria to gauge progress over the next several years. Transformation efforts within DoD today involve an inevitable tension between dealing with today's problems and preparing for tomorrow's. But an even more formidable tension exists between alternative views of tomorrow's challenges and between competing approaches to address them. Transformation is about defining and implementing a vision of the future different from the one embedded, if only implicitly, in DoD's current plans and programs. Such a transformation requires powerful, high-level support to survive in today's resource-competitive environment.