Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of Pease Air Force Base

Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of Pease Air Force Base
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 312
Release: 1990
Genre:
ISBN:

This Appendix I contains a reproduction of all written comments received from the public regarding the DEIS. Individual comments or groups of comments were identified in each letter and assigned a comment number. Opposite each numbered comment, an Air Force response with a corresponding number is presented. Comments received at the public hearings are presented in Appendix J - DEIS Public Hearing Transcripts. A careful review of the transcripts showed that all of the comments from the hearings were presented in greater detail in the written comments. Therefore, to avoid duplication, the comments received at the hearings were not assigned a comment number and were not specifically responded to.

Environmental Impact Statement, Pease Air Force Base Closure

Environmental Impact Statement, Pease Air Force Base Closure
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 82
Release: 1989
Genre:
ISBN:

A congressionally chartered Commission selected by the Secretary of Defense has proposed closing Pease Air Force Base (AFB), New Hampshire. This proposed action will involved the deactivation of the 509th Bombardment Wing, which presently consists of 21 FB-111 aircraft, 13 KC-135A tanker aircraft, and other operational and support units. The 132d Air Refueling Squadron of the Air National Guard (ANG) that is assigned to Pease AFB and consists of 10 KC-135E aircraft will not be deactivated. It will remain as a stand-alone tenant to the anticipated civilian operation of the airfield. Because of a previously programmed force structure action, the relocation of the 21 FB-111 bomber aircraft at Pease AFB is not considered as a part of the proposed action. The relocation of these aircraft has been assessed in a separate environmental impact document; the cumulative impacts of this action, however, are addressed in this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

Environmental Impact Analysis Process. Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of Pease Air Force Base, December 89

Environmental Impact Analysis Process. Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of Pease Air Force Base, December 89
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 144
Release: 1989
Genre:
ISBN:

The action evaluated in this EIS is the halting of operations and removal of equipment and personnel from Pease AFB, New Hampshire. The action involves the deactivation of the 509th Bombardment Wing, which currently operates 21 FB-111 fighter/bomber aircraft and 13 KC-135A tanker aircraft. Provisions of the Base Closure and Realignment Act preclude the examination of any alternatives to closure. Because the Act requires implementation of the closure, 'no action' is not an alternative and is not specifically included. A second EIS will be prepared to cover the final disposition of the base property including potential reuse. Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS).

Environmental Impact Analysis Process. Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of Pease Air Force Base

Environmental Impact Analysis Process. Environmental Impact Statement for the Closure of Pease Air Force Base
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 175
Release: 1990
Genre:
ISBN:

The action evaluated in this EIS is the halting of operations and removal of equipment and personnel from Pease AFB, New Hampshire. The action involves the deactivation of the 509th Bombardment Wing, which currently operates 21 FB-111 fighter/bomber aircraft and 13 KC-135A tanker aircraft. Provisions of the Base Closure and Realignment Act preclude the examination of any alternatives to closure. Because the Act requires implementation of the closure, 'no action' is not an alternative and is not specifically included. A second EIS will be prepared to cover the final disposition of the base property including potential reuse. Closure would significantly reduce on-base activity and associated environmental impacts. Air emissions, wastewater effluents, and solid wastes generated would be substantially reduced from current levels and would result in beneficial impacts to the environment. Effects on ecological resources are expected to be minimal with mitigation as planned. A significant reduction in the area within the 65 dB noise contour would occur due to base closure. Approximately 30 percent of the off-base population previously affected by this level of noise would no longer be subject to it. This reduction in the area affected by high levels of noise is not expected to result in any indirect land use changes because of the uncertainty regarding future use of the base and the possibility that it may be used as a commercial airport.