Excerpt from Summary of Cooperative Cases, Vol. 16: March 1961 After hearings the trial court entered a judgment, based upon extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law, that the railroads' publicity campaign had Violated the Sherman Act while that of the truckers' had not. The court rested its judgment upon findings, first, that the railroads' publicity campaign, insofar as it was actually directed at lawmaking and law enforcement authorities, was malicious and fraudulent and secondly, that the railroadsl campaign.had as an important purpose the destruo tion of the truckers' goodwill, among the truckers' customers and the general public, thus injuring the truckers in ways unrelated to the passage and enforcement of law. The trial court awarded only nominal damages to the individual truckers, holding that no damages were recoverable for loss of business due to the veto of the Pennsylvania Fair Truck Bill. The judgment, however, did award substantial damages to the truckers' trade association as well as the broad injunction asked for in the complaint. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.