OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews OECD Development Co‐operation Peer Reviews: Korea 2024

OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews OECD Development Co‐operation Peer Reviews: Korea 2024
Author: OECD
Publisher: OECD Publishing
Total Pages: 74
Release: 2024-05-21
Genre:
ISBN: 9264456279

The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts peer reviews of individual members once every five to six years. Reviews seek to improve the quality and effectiveness of members’ development co-operation, highlighting good practices and recommending improvements. Fourteen years after joining the DAC in 2010, Korea is at a pivotal juncture as it rapidly scales up official development assistance (ODA) and assumes more global responsibility. The 2020 revision of the Framework Act signals a more coherent, cross-government approach to implement a larger budget. There is potential to bring greater coherence between domestic and international policies supported by legislation on sustainable development. This peer review provides a set of recommendations for Korea to strengthen strategic partnerships and dialogue with partners, and use the cross-government capacity review and evaluations to prioritise larger ODA volumes to implementers. It recommends that Korea increase the number of qualified staff working in development across government, delegate more authority to partner country offices, and increase its risk appetite to expand private sector operations.

OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews OECD Development Co‐operation Peer Reviews: France 2024

OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews OECD Development Co‐operation Peer Reviews: France 2024
Author: OECD
Publisher: OECD Publishing
Total Pages: 85
Release: 2024-07-09
Genre:
ISBN: 9264552324

The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts peer reviews of individual members once every five to six years. Reviews seek to improve the quality and effectiveness of members’ development co-operation, highlighting good practices and recommending improvements. France has embarked on an ambitious reform of its development co-operation in institutional, strategic and financial terms. In addition to a substantial increase in the resources devoted to official development assistance and a strengthening of its crisis response instruments, France has championed the linkages between the green and social agendas and the mobilisation of the private sector for sustainable development. The review discusses the difficult balance between the objectives of visibility and development impact, particularly in fragile contexts. It makes recommendations on combining political impetus, steering by objectives and flexibility; deepening the cross-benefits between the social, environmental, and economic dimensions of sustainable development; and, strengthening the contribution of local private sector to poverty reduction by optimising available resources and instruments.

OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews OECD Development Co‐operation Peer Reviews: New Zealand 2023

OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews OECD Development Co‐operation Peer Reviews: New Zealand 2023
Author: OECD
Publisher: OECD Publishing
Total Pages: 72
Release: 2023-05-11
Genre:
ISBN: 9264596852

This peer review provides recommendations for New Zealand to make the most of the closer integration of foreign and development policy in the Pacific, reinforce human resources, enable efficient and effective decision making, strengthen transparency, build public understanding of development, foster the linkages between climate-related investments and other priorities, and establish a plan for increasing ODA to deliver on New Zealand’s strategic goals.

OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Spain 2022

OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Spain 2022
Author: OECD
Publisher: OECD Publishing
Total Pages: 61
Release: 2022-02-03
Genre:
ISBN: 9264584269

The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts peer reviews of individual members once every five to six years. Reviews seek to improve the quality and effectiveness of members’ development co-operation, highlighting good practices and recommending improvements.