Exploring Leadership Styles and Faculty Satisfaction in Higher Education

Exploring Leadership Styles and Faculty Satisfaction in Higher Education
Author: Justin Bateh
Publisher:
Total Pages: 214
Release: 2016-07-20
Genre:
ISBN: 9780692757581

This book is a must read for administration and human resources staff of colleges and universities who may be having difficulty with retaining highly qualified teaching instructors, academic professors, and adjunct faculty staff. The retention of faculty and staff of educational institutions has been of vital concern over the last decade, especially since the economic turmoil of 2008 and the aftermath of the great recession. The increase of online degrees has increased the competitiveness of finding, and keeping, qualified and valuable teaching staff. Retention of valuable teaching instructors ñ including adjunct, part-time, associate, and assistant professors is crucial in the survival and growth of academic institutions, as well as maintenance of accreditation credentialing and standards. This book focuses on a correlational research study, based on a faculty population in an institution of higher learning in Florida, that examined the relationship between perceived academic administrator leadership styles and the satisfaction of faculty members and transformational, transactional, and passive/avoidant leadership styles of academic administrators, with a dependent variable of job satisfaction for full-time faculty members. Based on a 95% significance level, the researcher identified a significant relationship between the three leadership styles and the academic instructor's job satisfaction, thus an inferred correlational relationship to staff retention. Using this model, academic leaders are encouraged to refine their leadership styles on the basis of faculty members' indicated preferences to increase and improve academic instructor's retention, as well as their satisfaction in working for the school. Three key recommendations for action were developed. First, senior academic administrators should identify current transformational leaders in their organizations and perhaps use them as mentors to assist in the training and mentorship of current and future leaders. Second, academic administrators should recognize that leadership traits can be learned, and therefore, provide professional development and training opportunities in the areas of transformational leadership for present and future academic leaders. Finally, those who seek leadership positions in academia should become aware of the attributes of an effective higher education administrator, and work to develop an intrinsic understanding of and cultivate a skill-set of transformational leadership characteristics. Key Search Terms In Book: academic leaders, achievement-oriented leadership, active leadership, affective commitment, autocratic leadership, avoidant leadership, behavioral idealized influence, charismatic leadership, citizenship behaviors, communication styles, contingent reward leadership, developmental leadership, distributive justice, dualistic leadership, effective leadership, empowerment frameworks, exemplary leaders, exploitative innovation, faculty leadership, gender discrimination, hierarchical structure, idealized influence, institutional leadership, job satisfaction, laissez-faire leadership, leadership behaviors, leadership models, leadership theory, management by exception, mentors / protégés, organizational climate / organizational culture, participative leadership, passive/avoidant leadership, professional development, pseudo-transformational leaders, psychological empowerment, realistic leadership, reward and incentive system, scope of influence, shared governance model, structural empowerment, supportive leadership, top-down management style, total quality management (TQM), transactional leadership, transformational leadership

Leadership and Organizational Outcomes

Leadership and Organizational Outcomes
Author: Engin Karadağ
Publisher: Springer
Total Pages: 275
Release: 2015-03-12
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 3319149083

This book focuses on the effect of leadership on organizational outcomes and summarizes the current research findings in the field. It addresses the need for inclusive and interpretive studies in the field in order to interpret leadership literature and suggest new pathways for further studies. Appropriately, a meta-analysis approach is used by the contributors to show the big picture to the researchers by analyzing and combining the findings from different independent studies. In particular, the editors compile various studies examining the relationship between the leadership and thirteen organizational outcomes separately. The philosophy behind this book is to direct future research and practices rather than addressing the limits of current studies.

An Investigation of the Relationship of Leadership and Managerial Styles with Job Satisfaction of Higher Education Faculty

An Investigation of the Relationship of Leadership and Managerial Styles with Job Satisfaction of Higher Education Faculty
Author: Karley Anne Goen
Publisher:
Total Pages: 164
Release: 2015
Genre: College teachers
ISBN:

The focus of this study was to identify which managerial style(s) and leadership style(s) are most effective in fostering collegiate faculty job satisfaction. This dissertation describes a study of 25 collegiate departments within a university that explored the relationship between department chairs’ leadership and managerial styles and faculty job satisfaction. The leadership and managerial styles of department chairs as perceived by faculty was measured using a five-point, Likert type questionnaire entitled “Faculty Questionnaire: Motivational Language Scale.” Research has suggested that strong department chair-faculty relationships promote trust and respect, which has been shown to contribute to universities’ success. With trust and respect in the department, a university’s culture and norms can become efficient, thriving, and competitive, and lead the ranks in today’s most admired colleges and universities. Results indicated that the Task Master managerial style variable shared the greatest relationship with faculty job satisfaction rs2 = .83. Results indicated that the Democratic leadership style variable shared the greatest relationship with faculty job satisfaction rs2 = .83 owing to the complexity of managerial and leadership styles under various contexts and situations.

Leadership Style of Community College Department Chairs and the Effects of Faculty Job Satisfaction

Leadership Style of Community College Department Chairs and the Effects of Faculty Job Satisfaction
Author: Martha Kirkman
Publisher:
Total Pages: 117
Release: 2004
Genre: Community colleges
ISBN:

The purpose of this investigation was to explore the leadership of community college department chairs and the job satisfaction of the faculty in community colleges. There appears to be a leadership crisis in higher education that has resulted from the complexity of the leaders' roles. The goal of this study was to investigate the leadership style of the department chairs in one community college and to research the satisfaction levels of the faculty at the community college to determine if indeed the leaders who demonstrate the characteristics of transformational leadership have followers who are more satisfied with their job. Leadership style surveys were distributed to each department chair and each faculty member on the campus and job satisfaction surveys will be distributed to each faculty member. Eight two-tailed, null hypotheses were tested at the .05 level of significance, addressing the eight research questions of the study. The Pearson correlation, two-sample t test, and ANOVA tests were used. There were non-significant correlations and outcomes that suggested directional propensities or tendencies among the variables. Although the literature indicated that higher order leadership skills such as transformational leadership should have been associated with greater job satisfaction among leaders and workers, the findings of this study did not confirm and even implied a possible reversal of the notion that transformational leadership led to greater job satisfaction. The relationship determined between leadership style and effectiveness of department chairs in a community college setting and faculty job satisfaction were an anomaly in this situation when contrasted to previous studies for other types of institutions. Faculty job satisfaction in this instance was not enhanced by department chairs practicing transformational leadership styles in the community college setting.

The Perceived Leadership Styles of Academic Team Leaders and the Self-reported Job Satisfaction of Community College Adjunct Faculty

The Perceived Leadership Styles of Academic Team Leaders and the Self-reported Job Satisfaction of Community College Adjunct Faculty
Author: Carlotta S. Walker
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2022
Genre: College teachers, Part-time
ISBN:

Community colleges have become increasingly reliant on adjunct faculty members to deliver content to their students. The impact adjunct faculty members have on the success of community college students is profound. Researchers found students taught by part-time faculty had less favorable outcomes in terms of persistence, completion, and transfer. Improvement of working conditions for community college adjunct faculty is imperative, as student success may be contingent on these improvements. Researchers have found job satisfaction to be related to performance, effectiveness, and other outcomes. Presumably, adjunct faculty members who are more satisfied with their jobs will have higher performance outcomes. Thus, understanding the level of job satisfaction and the role of leadership styles thereof can have a lasting impact on the success of students. There is a gap in the literature on job satisfaction and the role of leadership styles on job satisfaction of community adjunct faculty. The purpose of this explanatory sequential mixed methods study was to examine the relationship between the leadership style employed by the academic team leader and the job satisfaction of community college adjunct faculty members.