This is an annotated version of the book1. contains an updated biography of the author at the end of the book for a better understanding of the text.2. This book has been checked and corrected for spelling errorsTHE Morte D'Arthur was finished, as the epilogue tells us, in the ninthyear of Edward IV., i.e. between March 4, 1469 and the same date in1470. It is thus, fitly enough, the last important English book writtenbefore the introduction of printing into this country, and since nomanuscript of it has come down to us it is also the first Englishclassic for our knowledge of which we are entirely dependent on aprinted text. Caxton's story of how the book was brought to him and hewas induced to print it may be read farther on in his own preface. Fromthis we learn also that he was not only the printer of the book, butto some extent its editor also, dividing Malory's work into twenty-onebooks, splitting up the books into chapters, by no means skilfully,and supplying the "Rubrish" or chapter-headings. It may be added thatCaxton's preface contains, moreover, a brief criticism which, on thepoints on which it touches, is still the soundest and most sympatheticthat has been written.Caxton finished his edition the last day of July 1485, some fifteenor sixteen years after Malory wrote his epilogue. It is clear that theauthor was then dead, or the printer would not have acted as a clumsyeditor to the book, and recent discoveries (if bibliography may, for themoment, enlarge its bounds to mention such matters) have revealed withtolerable certainty when Malory died and who he was. In letters to TheAthenaeum in July 1896 Mr. T. Williams pointed out that the name ofa Sir Thomas Malorie occurred among those of a number of otherLancastrians excluded from a general pardon granted by Edward IV.in 1468, and that a William Mallerye was mentioned in the same yearas taking part in a Lancastrian rising. In September 1897, again, inanother letter to the same paper, Mr. A. T. Martin reported thefinding of the will of a Thomas Malory of Papworth, a hundred partlyin Cambridgeshire, partly in Hunts. This will was made on September 16,1469, and as it was proved the 27th of the next month the testatormust have been in immediate expectation of death. It contains the mostcareful provision for the education and starting in life of a family ofthree daughters and seven sons, of whom the youngest seems to have beenstill an infant. We cannot say with certainty that this Thomas Malory,whose last thoughts were so busy for his children, was our author, orthat the Lancastrian knight discovered by Mr. Williams was identicalwith either or both, but such evidence as the Morte D'Arthur offersfavours such a belief. There is not only the epilogue with its petition,"pray for me while I am alive that God send me good deliverance andwhen I am dead pray you all for my soul," but this very request isforeshadowed at the end of chap. 37 of Book ix. in the touching passage,surely inspired by personal experience, as to the sickness "that isthe greatest pain a prisoner may have"; and the reflections on Englishfickleness in the first chapter of Book xxi., though the Wars of theRoses might have inspired them in any one, come most naturally from anauthor who was a Lancastrian knight.If the Morte D'Arthur was really written in prison and by a prisonerdistressed by ill-health as well as by lack of liberty, surely no taskwas ever better devised to while away weary hours. Leaving abundantscope for originality in selection, modification, and arrangement, as acompilation and translation it had in it that mechanical element whichadds the touch of restfulness to literary work. No original, it is said,has yet been found for Book vii., and it is possible that none will everbe forthcoming for chap. 20 of Book xviii.,