Trial Evidence

Trial Evidence
Author: Austin Abbott
Publisher:
Total Pages: 968
Release: 1918
Genre: Actions and defenses
ISBN:

Evidence Law

Evidence Law
Author: Roger Park
Publisher: West Academic Publishing
Total Pages: 782
Release: 2004
Genre: Law
ISBN:

Written from an advocate's perspective, this guide introduces how the courtroom operates and offers a glimpse into the environment that influences these rulings. Major cases and doctrines are discussed. Examples are given to develop a feel for the context in which a particular evidence problem might arise-and for the language lawyers and judges use to resolve it. Also explores the rationale and purpose behind each rule.

Trial Evidence

Trial Evidence
Author: Richard Lea Kennedy
Publisher:
Total Pages: 236
Release: 1935
Genre: Evidence (Law)
ISBN:

Federal and California Evidence Rules

Federal and California Evidence Rules
Author: Thomas J. Leach
Publisher: Aspen Publishing
Total Pages: 620
Release: 2020-08-21
Genre: Law
ISBN: 154383034X

Federal and California Evidence Rules: With Notes, Comments, Selected Legislative History, and Comparative Commentary, 2020–2021 Edition

Trial Evidence

Trial Evidence
Author: Austin Abbott
Publisher: Forgotten Books
Total Pages: 920
Release: 2016-12-12
Genre: Law
ISBN: 9781334600340

Excerpt from Trial Evidence: The Rules of Evidence Applicable on the Trial of Civil Actions (Including Both Causes of Action and Defenses) At Common Law, in Equity, and Under the Codes of Procedure The method chosen for the statement of these rules is that which seemed to promise the best practical assistance to counsel and to the court, in the trial of issues; to the practitioner generally in preparing for trial and selecting witnesses; and also to the pleader in framing issues. The order of topics pursued first disposes of questions connected with the character of Particular Classes of Parties, as likely to arise in actions of almost any kind, and then proceeds with Particular Causes of Action, taking first those in which the main proof is usually of facts raising an implied contract or legal duty; followed by those involving writings unsealed, sealed, or of record; then those turning on negli gence or tort; then those seeking specific relief, founded on either of these kinds of transactions; and finally those which, in a greater degree, depend on statutes, &c. Defenses which are common to several classes of actions are not treated in connection with each cause of action, but in the third and last part of the volume. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

The Psychological Foundations of Evidence Law

The Psychological Foundations of Evidence Law
Author: Michael J. Saks
Publisher: NYU Press
Total Pages: 339
Release: 2016-01-22
Genre: Law
ISBN: 0814783872

Identifies and evaluates the psychological choices implicit in the rules of evidence Evidence law is meant to facilitate trials that are fair, accurate, and efficient, and that encourage and protect important societal values and relationships. In pursuit of these often-conflicting goals, common law judges and modern drafting committees have had to perform as amateur applied psychologists. Their task has required them to employ what they think they know about the ability and motivations of witnesses to perceive, store, and retrieve information; about the effects of the litigation process on testimony and other evidence; and about our capacity to comprehend and evaluate evidence. These are the same phenomena that cognitive and social psychologists systematically study. The rules of evidence have evolved to restrain lawyers from using the most robust weapons of influence, and to direct judges to exclude certain categories of information, limit it, or instruct juries on how to think about it. Evidence law regulates the form of questions lawyers may ask, filters expert testimony, requires witnesses to take oaths, and aims to give lawyers and factfinders the tools they need to assess witnesses’ reliability. But without a thorough grounding in psychology, is the “common sense” of the rulemakers as they create these rules always, or even usually, correct? And when it is not, how can the rules be fixed? Addressed to those in both law and psychology, The Psychological Foundations of Evidence Law draws on the best current psychological research-based knowledge to identify and evaluate the choices implicit in the rules of evidence, and to suggest alternatives that psychology reveals as better for accomplishing the law’s goals.