Land Resources Information for the Lake Erie Drainage Basin. Co-Occurrence of Land Resource Features. Volume III. Sandusky River Basin

Land Resources Information for the Lake Erie Drainage Basin. Co-Occurrence of Land Resource Features. Volume III. Sandusky River Basin
Author: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES WEST CHESTER PA.
Publisher:
Total Pages: 293
Release: 1979
Genre:
ISBN:

This report is a summary inventory of the land resource features of the United States portion of the Lake Erie Drainage Basin. It is presented in four volumes, of which this is Volume III. This volume includes the dual resource features summary tables and co-occurrence tables for the Sandusky River Basin and its subbasins.

Land Resources Information for the Lake Erie Drainage Basin. Co-Occurrence of Land Resource Features. Volume IV. Small Watersheds

Land Resources Information for the Lake Erie Drainage Basin. Co-Occurrence of Land Resource Features. Volume IV. Small Watersheds
Author: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES WEST CHESTER PA.
Publisher:
Total Pages: 220
Release: 1979
Genre:
ISBN:

This report is a summary inventory of the land resource features of the United States portion of the Lake Erie Drainage Basin. It is presented in four volumes, of which this is Volume IV. This volume includes the dual resource features summary tables and co-occurrance tables for the minor subbasin sampling station watersheds.

Application of the Universal Soil Loss Equation in the Lake Erie Drainage Basin

Application of the Universal Soil Loss Equation in the Lake Erie Drainage Basin
Author: Donald R. Urban
Publisher:
Total Pages: 62
Release: 1978
Genre: Erie, Lake
ISBN:

This report described the procedures used to determine potential gross erosion (PGE) in the U.S. portion of the Lake Erie drainage basin. The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was used in conjunction with the LEWMS-developed Land Resources Information System (LRIS) to determine gross erosion in the basin under existing conditions, and to evaluate the effect on gross erosion of several crop management options. These options included: reduce all soil losses to T (soil loss tollerance value), ban fall plowing, use winter cover crop, reduce tillage (chisel plow, disc, etc.), and conservation tillage (no-till on better-drained soils, chisel plow on soils with intermediate drainage). The report describes development of the USLE variables and gives samples of the output which is published as an appendix to this report. (Author).