Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide Implementation Plan

Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide Implementation Plan
Author: Todd E. Hoerner
Publisher:
Total Pages: 324
Release: 2007
Genre: Pavements
ISBN:

As AASH is expected to eventually adopt the MEPDG at its primary pavement design method, it is critical that the SDDOT become familiar with the MEPGD documentation and associated design software. The research conducted under this project was a first step toward achieving this goal.

Implementing the AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide in Missouri

Implementing the AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide in Missouri
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2009
Genre: Pavements
ISBN:

Volume I summarizes the entire research effort and documents findings from a review of MEPDG-related literature, an assessment of MoDOT's MEPDG input data needs, MoDOT's laboratory and field testing efforts, sensitivity analysis using MoDOT specific inputs, and model validation and calibration tasks. In addition, Volume I also discusses the steps MoDOT could undertake in the future to fully implement the MEPDG. Volume II presents a section-by-section comparison of the predicted and measured distresses for MoDOT-specific LTPP and State Pavement Management System sections for HMA pavements and JPCP.

Implementation of the Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide in Utah

Implementation of the Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide in Utah
Author: Michael I. Darter
Publisher:
Total Pages: 218
Release: 2009
Genre: Pavements
ISBN:

"Highway agencies across the nation are moving towards implementation of the new AASHTO Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) for pavement design. The objective of this project was to implement the MEPDG into the daily operations of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). The implementation of the MEPDG as a UDOT standard required modifications in some UDOT pavement design protocols (i.e., lab testing procedures, equipment, and protocols, traffic data reporting, software issues, design output interpretation, and others). A key requirement is validation of the MEPDG's nationally calibrated pavement distress and smoothness prediction models when applied under Utah conditions and performing local calibration if needed. This was accomplished using data from Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) projects located in Utah and UDOT pavement management system (PMS) pavement sections. The nationally calibrated MEPDG models were evaluated. With the exception of the new hot-mix asphalt (HMA) pavement total rutting model, all other models were found to be reasonable. The rutting model was locally calibrated to increase goodness of fit and remove significant bias. Due to the nature of the data used in model validation, it is recommended that further MEPDG model validation be accomplished in the future using a database that contains HMA pavement and jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) exhibiting moderate to severe deterioration. This report represents Phase II of the UDOT MEPDG implementation study and builds on the Phase I study report completed in 2005 for UDOT. The Draft User's Guide for UDOT Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design (UDOT Research Report No. UT-09.11a, dated October 2009) incorporates the findings of this report as inputs and pavement design guidelines for Utah for use by UDOT's pavement design engineers during trial implementation of the MEPDG"--Technical report documentation p.