Excerpt from Illinois Appellate Court Unpublished Opinions, Vol. 95: Second Series To this pleading plaintiff made no response, the court below on November 15, 1966, upon motion of defendant, entering a judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiff in the limited sum of Within thirty days, however, plaintiff filed a motion to vacate that order and for a judgment in full on the Appeal Bond, citing to the court its erroneous interpretation of the language of the Chancery decree. We might interject that the complete file from the former separate maintenance proceeding was before the court in this regard by means of judicial notice of the contents thereof. After a full hearing on said motion, a report of proceedings of which has not been preserved for the record on appeal, the court below set aside its previous judgment, entering judgment in plaintiff's favor for Defendant subsequently filed a motion to vacate that latter judgment, which motion was denied, and from which denial he brings this appeal. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.