FUTURE UK AND US TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT DIFFERENCE

FUTURE UK AND US TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT DIFFERENCE
Author: John Lok
Publisher:
Total Pages: 74
Release: 2022-02-04
Genre:
ISBN:

This book divides three parts. The first part explains what future technology factors will influence US economy development. The second part explains what future technology factors will influence UK economy development. The final part that I shall give some economy theories to explain why these kinds of technological factors can influence future these both countries' economy growth. It brings these two questions: What are future influential technological development trend to US and UK? Can technological resource shortage threaten UK and US technological service or product manufacturing industries development ?

UK & Us Future Unique Technology: Development Difference

UK & Us Future Unique Technology: Development Difference
Author: Johnny Ch Lok
Publisher: Independently Published
Total Pages: 128
Release: 2019-02-18
Genre: Reference
ISBN: 9781797467351

Chapter TwoUS Future Unique TechnologyEnvironment protection technologySome economists predict developing countries every city in the global 750 is projected to have a larger future technological economy growth. But the diversity of developing countries' economic performance is large. Developing economy cities, such as China, Japan, Hong Kong, Korea cities can grow rapidly by acquiring capital and technological know-how and putting them to use by their rapidly growing urban labor forces. Even, these developing countries cities' rapid technological development can impact to US labor market supply.Due to future rapid technological development to these developing countries, the result will cause developing countries cities, such as Asia China, Hong Kong, India cities economy growth will rapidly. Otherwise, developed western countries cities, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries lie close to the technological frontier have stable urban populations and more limited investment and job creation opportunities. It will influence these developed countries' economic growth is slow than the developing countries. Due to developing Asia countries cities will prefer to invest more technological development to compare to developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries. Therefore developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries tend to grow more slowly. It seems developing Asia countries, such as Hong Kong, China, Korea etc. countries urban and central cities economic performance within developing countries will be better than developed countries, such as UK, US urban and central cities within five years.Thus, I suppose that future developed countries, such as US the speed of technological development will be slower to compare developing countries, such as Hong Kong, China, Korea, India etc. countries. Then, it will bring this question: How to solve developed countries, such as US, Washington, New York etc. cities future economic slow growth challenge? For future developed country cities, such as New York, Washington etc. large cities' technological investment and location decision, it will need understand that diversity is essential. Various factors can have an impact on US country intra-national urban cities performance, including sector structures, agglomeration benefits, infrastructure quality. For example, US country central government needs have tolerance of diverse performance, land supply and US city governance plan. It aims to raise US central and urban cities' future economic performance. Moreover, US country will need to concern above issues to arrange how to improve central and urban city economic development . Specially, it will need to concern technology innovation to encourage many overseas technology investors to anticipate different kinds of technology products innovation, e.g. human intelligence machine, mobile, computer etc. high technology products. It aims to absorb different countries' new technological knowledge of different kinds of high technological products to excite US domestic or foreign countries consumers' desires to choose to buy many different kinds of high technological products to raise US GDP growth in US technological product sector industry in the future.

UK and US Future Unique Technology Development Difference

UK and US Future Unique Technology Development Difference
Author: Johnny Ch LOK
Publisher:
Total Pages: 127
Release: 2019-01-27
Genre:
ISBN: 9781795252218

Chapter TwoUS Future Unique TechnologyEnvironment protection technologySome economists predict developing countries every city in the global 750 is projected to have a larger future technological economy growth. But the diversity of developing countries' economic performance is large. Developing economy cities, such as China, Japan, Hong Kong, Korea cities can grow rapidly by acquiring capital and technological know-how and putting them to use by their rapidly growing urban labor forces. Even, these developing countries cities' rapid technological development can impact to US labor market supply.Due to future rapid technological development to these developing countries, the result will cause developing countries cities, such as Asia China, Hong Kong, India cities economy growth will rapidly. Otherwise, developed western countries cities, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries lie close to the technological frontier have stable urban populations and more limited investment and job creation opportunities. It will influence these developed countries' economic growth is slow than the developing countries. Due to developing Asia countries cities will prefer to invest more technological development to compare to developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries. Therefore developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries tend to grow more slowly. It seems developing Asia countries, such as Hong Kong, China, Korea etc. countries urban and central cities economic performance within developing countries will be better than developed countries, such as UK, US urban and central cities within five years.Thus, I suppose that future developed countries, such as US the speed of technological development will be slower to compare developing countries, such as Hong Kong , China, Korea, India etc. countries. Then, it will bring this question: How to solve developed countries, such as US, Washington, New York etc. cities future economic slow growth challenge? For future developed country cities, such as New York, Washington etc. large cities' technological investment and location decision, it will need understand that diversity is essential. Various factors can have an impact on US country intra-national urban cities performance, including sector structures, agglomeration benefits, infrastructure quality. For example, US country central government needs have tolerance of diverse performance, land supply and US city governance plan. It aims to raise US central and urban cities' future economic performance. Moreover, US country will need to concern above issues to arrange how to improve central and urban city economic development . Specially, it will need to concern technology innovation to encourage many overseas technology investors to anticipate different kinds of technology products innovation, e.g. human intelligence machine, mobile, computer etc. high technology products. It aims to absorb different countries' new technological knowledge of different kinds of high technological products to excite US domestic or foreign countries consumers' desires to choose to buy many different kinds of high technological products to raise US GDP growth in US technological product sector industry in the future.

UK & Us Future Predictive Technological Difference

UK & Us Future Predictive Technological Difference
Author: Johnny Ch Lok
Publisher: Independently Published
Total Pages: 132
Release: 2018-11-25
Genre:
ISBN: 9781790333981

Chapter TwoExternal environmental impact Some economists predict developing countries every city in the global 750 is projected to have a larger future technological economy growth. But the diversity of developing countries' economic performance is large. Developing economy cities, such as China, Japan, Hong Kong, Korea cities can grow rapidly by acquiring capital and technological know-how and putting them to use by their rapidly growing urban labor forces. Even, these developing countries cities' rapid technological development can impact to US labor market supply.Due to future rapid technological development to these developing countries, the result will cause developing countries cities, such as Asia China, Hong Kong, India cities economy growth will rapidly. Otherwise, developed western countries cities, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries lie close to the technological frontier have stable urban populations and more limited investment and job creation opportunities. It will influence these developed countries' economic growth is slow than the developing countries. Due to developing Asia countries cities will prefer to invest more technological development to compare to developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries. Therefore developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries tend to grow more slowly. It seems developing Asia countries, such as Hong Kong, China, Korea etc. countries urban and central cities economic performance within developing countries will be better than developed countries, such as UK, US urban and central cities within five years.Thus, I suppose that future developed countries, such as US the speed of technological development will be slower to compare developing countries, such as Hong Kong, China, Korea, India etc. countries. Then, it will bring this question: How to solve developed countries, such as US, Washington, New York etc. cities future economic slow growth challenge? For future developed country cities, such as New York, Washington etc. large cities' technological investment and location decision, it will need understand that diversity is essential. Various factors can have an impact on US country intra-national urban cities performance, including sector structures, agglomeration benefits, infrastructure quality. For example, US country central government needs have tolerance of diverse performance, land supply and US city governance plan. It aims to raise US central and urban cities' future economic performance. Moreover, US country will need to concern above issues to arrange how to improve central and urban city economic development . Specially, it will need to concern technology innovation to encourage many overseas technology investors to anticipate different kinds of technology products innovation, e.g. human intelligence machine, mobile, computer etc. high technology products. It aims to absorb different countries' new technological knowledge of different kinds of high technological products to excite US domestic or foreign countries consumers' desires to choose to buy many different kinds of high technological products to raise US GDP growth in US technological product sector industry in the future.

UK And US Future Unique Technology

UK And US Future Unique Technology
Author: Johnny Ch Lok
Publisher: Independently Published
Total Pages: 128
Release: 2019-04-23
Genre:
ISBN: 9781095633304

I stressed a very important point, namely that the UK future high technological automatic product competitor China and India, namely that economies not only grow, but in the process change their structure. China and India have been industry very rapidly (the first transition) and building the physical infrastructure that accompanies industrialization changes to technology in the future. However, at a certain per capita GNP level the two countries, such as China and India will face another structural shift when which technological development will reach the mature stage in the future. China and India had been primarily historical pattern of economic development because the shift in the role of engine of growth from industry to services is to a much greater extent a qualitative shift. Both higher and different skills are required. And, even more importantly, interactions generating ideas driving the highly human-capital-intensive service economy require a much freer environment, not only in the economic area. Chinese exports have been heavily labor-intensive. This being the case, they contributed to the expansion of industrial employment, offering for the first time in the history of China a taste of (very modest) prosperity to more than 100 million new industrial workers and their families. This is the major component of the success accomplished by Chinese economic growth. Richer trade partners create room for more trade, so the Chinese should hope that intra-South trade, that is, trade between the emerging economies of Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, will open up new and growing opportunities. I presume that if Western economy, such as UK did not developed high technological automatic industry to stable their social welfare, so thoroughly slowed down their economic growth.Will it allow China to accomplish the transition to a mature, innovation, service-sector-based market economy? It has allowed the economy to industrialize much more successfully, even if the labor shift from agriculture to industry has not yet been completed. But it is a long way off the next major test: the second high technological industry transition of the economic structure to China. Bear in mind that Russia attempted it twice and failed at both attempts.But even, assuming that China at some point in the future does succeed in accomplishing the second transition, will it be able to supersede the USA, for example, as the main global high automatic technological innovation center if it wants to become the No.1 global high technological industry economy? Given the nature of the centralized state and its stability to collect financial resources, China's ability to increase research and development expenditure to high automatic technological products and to hire a mass of researchers, engineers, technicians and other specialists should not be doubted. This process in already taking place.

Factors Influence Future UK and Us Technological Development

Factors Influence Future UK and Us Technological Development
Author: Johnny Ch Lok
Publisher:
Total Pages: 74
Release: 2021-04-17
Genre:
ISBN:

Distance learning education technologyIn the past, there fundamental forces have shaped US work labor market, includes an increase in the returns to education. General education upgrading and the large numbers of female need to work. How educational attainment, demographics and human capital will be predicted to influence US future labor market. Some economists believe education is useful to influence US future labor market. They indicate the social returns to education policies today depend on the relative prices that labor of different educational levels will command in future US labor market; current US labor market trends appear to leave a large group behind; less educated males. The rationale for social policies target specifically to this population is strengthened if predicted future outcomes in US labor market will lead this less educated male group numbers to fall down.How to supply educational level components to influence future changes in US labor supplied? It can change in the size of the US working age population, it can change in hours worked conditional on being of working age, and it can change in the skills (effective human capital units) to US workers of different education levels, gender and age . In US, the labor is supplied by both highly educated men and women increased substantially relative to the supply of labor by the less educated. Among US males this is largely, due to an increase in educational attainment; highly educated US males did not differentially increase their supplied compared to less educated males nor did their experience differential increases in their human capital policy in US. For US females, some economists found large increases in the labor supplied by US working age women that are due to both large increases in hours worked and increase in educational attainment. So, I assume that future US will have many high educational level female labors to work in US society.Today, human history is at the beginning of a growth industrial revolution. Developments in genetics, artificial intelligence, robotics, nanotechnology, 3D printing and biotechnology will be popular to influence US future job market change. For example, smart systems, product-homes, factories, farms or cities with help to solve problems ranging from supply chain management to climate change. The rise of the sharing economy will allow US human to monetize everything from their empty house to their car. Due to the future patterns of consumption will change to trend high technology life enjoyment, it will cause production and employment will also change to employ high technological production labor. As entire industries adjust, most US occupations are changed to high technological manufacturing industries. When some US jobs are threatened by others grow through a change in the skill sets required to do them. a key element in understanding how the benefits and burdens of the growth. Nowadays, the current technological changes of humans and machines, but rather an opportunity for work to truly become a channel though which human recognize full potential. As US is a high technological developed country. I assume many US employers will choose to act to be the first high technological and invention manufacturing leader to encourage which labors need to learn high technological production methods to prepare manufacture any new technological products to sell in the future US domestic or foreign both markets. Thus, it is possible that future high technological manufacturing labor numbers will be shared large go e.g. 50 to 60% future total US labor market.

Future Technology Development Influences Human Living Standard

Future Technology Development Influences Human Living Standard
Author: Johnny Ch LOK
Publisher:
Total Pages: 180
Release: 2018-03-24
Genre:
ISBN: 9781980641148

Nowadays, UK and US is one effort technological development country. I believe they have effort to develop any technology, e.g. building, space navigation, bioscience, computer, medical etc. different technological development. However, in the economic theory view point, it indicates our earth has limited and scare natural resource to supply human to use, so if UK and US government or businessmen made wrong decision to choose to concentrate on developing any one of the non-important or urgent needs of technology, then UK and US countries will face to use any scare natural resource to develop the important or urgent needs of technology to provide UK os US citizen and their next generation to satisfy their future needs. Thus, how to allocate to apply the natural resource to develop which kinds of high technology issue which is one valid research question to UK and US societies nowadays.In fact, UK and US building technology had reached the mature stage, the building technology innovation is very excellent to compare other countries. So, UK and US governments do not need spend more resource to invest to building technology aspect. Also, the biotechnology technology is excellent to satisfy any hospital patients' needs. Even, computer technology and space navigation technology are also excellent to compare other countries. UK and US had invented many different kinds of new computers or space navigation products to satisfy UK and US citizen's needs. So, UK and US governments do not need to encourage to provide financial support to any UK businessmen to develop these two kind technologies.This book will anwer these questions: What kind of technologies will be UK and US governments and businessmen who need to spend to invest and develop within ten years? Are environment and education and automatic manufacturing technologies will be UK and US future new technological development trends? What will be the difference between UK and US future technologies development both in the future?

UK & Us Future Predictive Technological Development

UK & Us Future Predictive Technological Development
Author: Johnny Ch Lok
Publisher: Independently Published
Total Pages: 62
Release: 2018-11-21
Genre:
ISBN: 9781790161683

Natural rate of unemploymentEconomists believe why natural rate of unemployment will occur in any countries. They indicate that during economy condition keeps at the balance situation ( condition), anyway any country government adopts any policy. However, the natural rate of unemployment won't reach to zero level as well as there are some people will still unemployed or it is possible that some people will be alternative employment between any time. Hence, it means that although US and UK is an developed country. It can not guarantee there are not any people unemployed, so the natural rate of unemployment will not reach to zero level.So, it seems that US and UK current economy condition had kept at the balance situation ( condition). Thus, even future science, technology, engineering and mathematics workers will drive US innovation and competitiveness by new ideas, new companies and new industries in US. However, US and UK employers frequently concern the supply and availability of this kind of workers. Over the past 10 years, growth in this kind of jobs was three times as fast as growth to general jobs in US. In the future the Natural rate of unemployment of US and UK science, technology, engineering and mathematics worker number must not reach zero level.Anyway, in the future, the perspective of bio-medical industry will be an alternative growth scenario. So, US and UK government will need to modest improvements in key policy areas to adopt bio-medical industry needs, e.g. more favorable coverage and payment policies for medical innovation, improvements in regulatory policy to create efficiencies in research and development process and improvements in policy to incentive R & D ( research and development) create efficiencies in the R & D process.As an industry rooted in science and advanced manufacturing, the innovation bio-medical industry is uniquely position to help maintain US leadership in new technologies and scientific to continue to create high quality, high wage R&D and manufacturing jobs and enhance America's global competitiveness in the future. In the future the Natural rate of unemployment of US and UK of bio-medical industry worker number must not reach zero level. Thus, if future US had enough job number which could supply to these high technological and bio medical industries of labors to do. However, the natural rate of unemployment must not reach at zero level and it does not represent its economy is poor because one developed country, such as US had been experiencing economy condition keeps at the balance situation( condition), so it's natural rate of unemployment must not reach zero level . Otherwise, the developing countries

Future Technology Development Brings What Positive and Negative Influence To

Future Technology Development Brings What Positive and Negative Influence To
Author: Johnny Ch Lok
Publisher: Independently Published
Total Pages: 170
Release: 2018-12-28
Genre:
ISBN: 9781792812972

Due to future rapid technological development to these developing countries, the result will cause developing countries cities, such as Asia China, Hong Kong, India cities economy growth will rapidly. Otherwise, developed western countries cities, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries lie close to the technological frontier have stable urban populations and more limited investment and job creation opportunities. It will influence these developed countries' economic growth is slow than the developing countries. Due to developing Asia countries cities will prefer to invest more technological development to compare to developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries. Therefore developed countries, such as US, UK, Canada, Australia, Span, Germany etc. countries tend to grow more slowly. It seems developing Asia countries, such as Hong Kong, China, Korea etc. countries urban and central cities economic performance within developing countries will be better than developed countries, such as UK, US urban and central cities within five years.Thus, I suppose that future developed countries, such as US the speed of technological development will be slower to compare developing countries, such as Hong Kong, China, Korea, India etc. countries. Then, it will bring this question: How to solve developed countries, such as US, Washington, New York etc. cities future economic slow growth challenge? For future developed country cities, such as New York, Washington etc. large cities' technological investment and location decision, it will need understand that diversity is essential. Various factors can have an impact on US country intra-national urban cities performance, including sector structures, agglomeration benefits, infrastructure quality. For example, US country central government needs have tolerance of diverse performance, land supply and US city governance plan. It aims to raise US central and urban cities' future economic performance. Moreover, US country will need to concern above issues to arrange how to improve central and urban city economic development . Specially, it will need to concern technology innovation to encourage many overseas technology investors to anticipate different kinds of technology products innovation, e.g. human intelligence machine, mobile, computer etc. high technology products. It aims to absorb different countries' new technological knowledge of different kinds of high technological products to excite US domestic or foreign countries consumers' desires to choose to buy many different kinds of high technological products to raise US GDP growth in US technological product sector industry in the future.

UK and US Future Unique Technology Competitive

UK and US Future Unique Technology Competitive
Author: Johnny Ch LOK
Publisher:
Total Pages: 127
Release: 2019-01-26
Genre:
ISBN: 9781795166249

Ecommerce social economic development technologyHas it relationship between social influence and economic environment in future US? For example, the social factors that are positively correlated with the economic growth ( i.e. the expected years of schooling and the life expectancy) and respectively, the factors that are negatively correlated with US future economic growth ( i.e. the US population or risk of poverty and the unemployment rate).The improvement of the US future economic environment will be an objective of the macroeconomic policy on short, medium and also long term. The importance of social factors upon US future economic growth, considering that the future used macroeconomic indicator, GDP per capita, is not most proper measure for the future US nation welfare. Due to GDP per capital fails to take into consideration some specific sectors of the US social economy, such as the black market.Until recently, some economists rely on culture is as a possible determinant of economic phenomena. However, in current years, better techniques and more date made it possible to identify systematic differences in people's preferences and beliefs and to relate them to various measures of cultural environment suggest an approach to introduce cultural-based explanation that can be tested and are able to substantially understand economic phenomena.The increased importance of social factors relies on a basic concept. Some theory is measured to economic growth which has wrong assumption. For example, the fiscal and monetary policies focused on increasing the national income, which lead consequently to economic growth. The reason most of economic opinions have been argued because whose opinions are based on a wrong hypothesis, according to which the nation welfare is based only on the level of income.Can social factors influence US future economic growth? Human development history, global life expectancy has been experiencing these stages: from the industrialization process, the technologic progress, the medical evolution, the scientific research, these stages were also related to internal causes, specific to some developed countries, e.g. US developed country. Thus, the differences are significant and are linked both to US life expectancy level and the GDP /capita. Such as US population is less than China population too much. Although, US land area is near to China area. It seems US will encounter life expectancy level need to prepare its technological development to raise economy growth of opportunity. For example, Africa and Asia are still facing major economic and social issues. The access to a health life and medical services are still long terms objectives for countries with low life expectancy.According to Harrison & Huntington (2000), the analysis of social factors helps understanding the human behavior with respect to consumption, savings, investment system, expectations and attitudes towards the economic circumstances, which also have a major impact on the economic growth. The evolutions of economic and social environment are needed for US future development. In order to eliminate the gap of living standard, outside resources and support US needs have good social indicators study plan to concern econometric model to rise poor people living standard in future US society between rich and poor people who are living in US. However, I believe the social factors include demographic and culture, population's structure factors which are one important social indicator to influence the distribution of the US social public income.