Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2007-08. Commission Report 07-15

Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2007-08. Commission Report 07-15
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission
Publisher:
Total Pages: 12
Release: 2007
Genre:
ISBN:

To prepare this report, the Commission examined faculty salary data supplied by the University of California (UC) and the California State University (CSU) systems. This report compares faculty salaries at California's public universities with faculty salaries at comparable institutions of higher education. Based on five-year trend projections, faculty salaries at the California State University and the University of California will lag salaries at comparable institutions.

Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2004-05. Number UP

Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2004-05. Number UP
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission
Publisher:
Total Pages: 10
Release: 2004
Genre:
ISBN:

Annually, in accordance with Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 51 of the 1965 General Legislative Session, the California State University and the University of California submit to the California Postsecondary Education Commission information on faculty salaries for their respective institutions and for a set of comparison colleges and universities located primarily outside of California. Commission staff develops estimates of the percentage changes in faculty salaries in California public universities that will enable them to attain parity with their respective comparison groups in the forthcoming fiscal year. These final parity figures for both systems are based on final data from five of the eight University of California comparison institutions, and 19 of the 20 California State University comparison institutions. A preliminary estimate of faculty salary parity was reported to the Department of Finance and the Office of the Legislative Analyst last December. This report contains a brief description of the methodology employed to calculate the parity percentages, and the faculty salary increase trends over the past 23 years. Supplemental Budget Language adopted by the Legislature in 1998 precludes changes in the methodology prior to the 2002-03 budget cycle. Because of the lengthy lead times required to develop the Governor's Budget, if any changes in the methodology are contemplated for the 2005-06 cycle, discussions among the members of the Commission's Faculty Salary Advisory Committee should begin no later than the of 2004. (Contains 7 displays.).

Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2006-07. Commission Report 06-01

Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2006-07. Commission Report 06-01
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission
Publisher:
Total Pages: 12
Release: 2006
Genre:
ISBN:

The Commission regularly conducts a study on faculty salaries in California's public universities as compared with faculty salaries at comparable institutions. This study presents estimates of the percentage changes in faculty salaries that would enable California faculty to attain parity with their comparison groups in the coming fiscal year. The analysis is based on data from six of the eight University of California comparison institutions, and all 20 California State University comparison institutions. This year's methodology is unchanged from the last several years; it consists of two primary elements: (1) collecting salary data from comparison institutions; and (2) a computational process that involves the weighting of several data elements by various factors, such as the number of faculty at each rank. (Contains 8 displays.).

Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2003-04

Faculty Salaries at California's Public Universities, 2003-04
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 9
Release: 2003
Genre: College teachers
ISBN:

This site predicts that the salaries of instructors at California's public universities may not be increased during the 2002-2003 academic year, thus affecting the recruitment and retention of faculty. Methodology is presented and the conclusions are backed up by numerous charts.