Setting priorities for publicly funded research

Setting priorities for publicly funded research
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Lords: Science and Technology Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
Total Pages: 520
Release: 2010-04-14
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 9780108472404

In its report into how priorities are set for publicly funded research, the Science and Technology Committee calls on the Government to make a clear and unambiguous statement setting out their research funding commitments and the periods of time over which those commitments apply.

Setting Priorities in Science

Setting Priorities in Science
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science
Publisher:
Total Pages: 272
Release: 1992
Genre: Political Science
ISBN:

Setting Priorities for Publicly Funded Research: 3rd Report of Session 2009-10

Setting Priorities for Publicly Funded Research: 3rd Report of Session 2009-10
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords. Science and Technology Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
Total Pages: 60
Release: 2010
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 9780108472329

In its report into how priorities are set for publicly funded research, the Science and Technology Committee calls on the Government to make a clear and unambiguous statement setting out their current research funding commitments and the periods of time over which those commitments will apply. Decisions about funding priorities are complex and require careful judgement about the deployment of funds between competing priorities. The Committee concludes that, in the current policy framework, there is a lack of oversight of the total spend on research which is needed to enable the Government to make coherent, well-founded decisions about the use of public funds to support research. The Committee recommends that: the Government Chief Scientific Adviser (GCSA) should publish figures annually, broken down by subject area, on all public spending to support research, and make appropriate recommendations to the Prime Minister; he should also attend Treasury meetings at which departmental budgets are considered; departmental CSAs should provide Ministers with timely information in advance of budget negotiations, to ensure that research funding decisions are informed by the best available advice. The Committee was also alerted to problems concerning the funding of cross-departmental research involving multiple funding agencies, including research to meet the grand challenges that society faces. To meet such challenges, the Committee recommends the establishment of specific mechanisms: to identify major cross-cutting policy challenges; and to identify, fund and co-ordinate appropriate responses to such challenges.

Setting Priorities for Science

Setting Priorities for Science
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology
Publisher:
Total Pages: 240
Release: 1983
Genre: Federal aid to research
ISBN:

Research Funding Mechanisms

Research Funding Mechanisms
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Task Force on Science Policy
Publisher:
Total Pages: 222
Release: 1986
Genre: Endowment of research
ISBN:

Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation

Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Total Pages: 236
Release: 2004-07-15
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 0309090849

In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) created a special account to fund large (several tens of millions of dollars) research facilities. Over the years, these facilities have come to represent an increasingly prominent part of the nation's R&D portfolio. Recently concern has intensified about the way NSF is selecting projects for this account. In 2003, six U.S. Senators including the chair and ranking member of the Senate Subcommittee on VA, HUD, and Independent Agencies Appropriations expressed these concerns in a letter to the NRC asking it to "review the current prioritization process and report to us on how it can be improved." This report presents a series of recommendations on how NSF can improve its priority setting process for large research facilities. While noting that NSF has improved this process, the report states that further strengthening is needed if NSF is to meet future demands for such projects.

Research Funding as an Investment

Research Funding as an Investment
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Task Force on Science Policy
Publisher:
Total Pages: 512
Release: 1986
Genre: Endowment of research
ISBN: