Establishing Priorities in Science Funding
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Budget. Task Force on Defense, Foreign Policy, and Space |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 292 |
Release | : 1991 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : |
Download Establishing Priorities In Science Funding full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Establishing Priorities In Science Funding ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Budget. Task Force on Defense, Foreign Policy, and Space |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 292 |
Release | : 1991 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : |
Author | : Great Britain: Parliament: House of Lords: Science and Technology Committee |
Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
Total Pages | : 520 |
Release | : 2010-04-14 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : 9780108472404 |
In its report into how priorities are set for publicly funded research, the Science and Technology Committee calls on the Government to make a clear and unambiguous statement setting out their research funding commitments and the periods of time over which those commitments apply.
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 272 |
Release | : 1992 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : |
Author | : Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords. Science and Technology Committee |
Publisher | : The Stationery Office |
Total Pages | : 60 |
Release | : 2010 |
Genre | : Business & Economics |
ISBN | : 9780108472329 |
In its report into how priorities are set for publicly funded research, the Science and Technology Committee calls on the Government to make a clear and unambiguous statement setting out their current research funding commitments and the periods of time over which those commitments will apply. Decisions about funding priorities are complex and require careful judgement about the deployment of funds between competing priorities. The Committee concludes that, in the current policy framework, there is a lack of oversight of the total spend on research which is needed to enable the Government to make coherent, well-founded decisions about the use of public funds to support research. The Committee recommends that: the Government Chief Scientific Adviser (GCSA) should publish figures annually, broken down by subject area, on all public spending to support research, and make appropriate recommendations to the Prime Minister; he should also attend Treasury meetings at which departmental budgets are considered; departmental CSAs should provide Ministers with timely information in advance of budget negotiations, to ensure that research funding decisions are informed by the best available advice. The Committee was also alerted to problems concerning the funding of cross-departmental research involving multiple funding agencies, including research to meet the grand challenges that society faces. To meet such challenges, the Committee recommends the establishment of specific mechanisms: to identify major cross-cutting policy challenges; and to identify, fund and co-ordinate appropriate responses to such challenges.
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture. Subcommittee on Department Operations and Nutrition |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 228 |
Release | : 1993 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 240 |
Release | : 1983 |
Genre | : Federal aid to research |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Task Force on Science Policy |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 222 |
Release | : 1986 |
Genre | : Endowment of research |
ISBN | : |
Author | : United States. General Accounting Office |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 48 |
Release | : 1981 |
Genre | : Agriculture |
ISBN | : |
Author | : National Research Council |
Publisher | : National Academies Press |
Total Pages | : 236 |
Release | : 2004-07-15 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : 0309090849 |
In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) created a special account to fund large (several tens of millions of dollars) research facilities. Over the years, these facilities have come to represent an increasingly prominent part of the nation's R&D portfolio. Recently concern has intensified about the way NSF is selecting projects for this account. In 2003, six U.S. Senators including the chair and ranking member of the Senate Subcommittee on VA, HUD, and Independent Agencies Appropriations expressed these concerns in a letter to the NRC asking it to "review the current prioritization process and report to us on how it can be improved." This report presents a series of recommendations on how NSF can improve its priority setting process for large research facilities. While noting that NSF has improved this process, the report states that further strengthening is needed if NSF is to meet future demands for such projects.
Author | : United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Task Force on Science Policy |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 512 |
Release | : 1986 |
Genre | : Endowment of research |
ISBN | : |