Rental Assistance Program

Rental Assistance Program
Author: Pasadena Community Development Commission
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2000
Genre: City planning
ISBN:

"The purpose of the administrative plan is to establish the policies for carrying out the PCDC Rental Assistance Programs in a manner consistent with HUD requirements and local objectives."--Statement of Policies and Objectives, p. 1-3.

Administrative Plan for the Transitory Rental Assistance Program

Administrative Plan for the Transitory Rental Assistance Program
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2010
Genre: Low-income housing
ISBN:

"The State of Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS) Transitionary Rental Assistance Program (T-RAP) is a rent subsidy program with a maximum term of one year, created by legislation in 1999 through Public Act 99-279. It is intended to supplement the Federal Section 8 Housing Program (now known as the Housing Choice Voucher Program) and the state's Rental Assistance Program , by providing an opportunity for low-income families, who become employed and leave Temporary Family Assistance (TFA), to live in decent, safe and sanitary housing (see sections 17b-811a-1 through 17b-811a-8 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies). The program requirements are described in and implemented through this administrative plan"--Introduction.

Worst Case Housing Needs 2017 Report to Congress

Worst Case Housing Needs 2017 Report to Congress
Author: U.s. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Publisher:
Total Pages: 92
Release: 2017-08-20
Genre:
ISBN: 9781974643325

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is pleased totransmit to the U.S. Congress this 2017 report on Worst Case Housing Needs.This report-the 16th in a longstanding series-provides national data andanalysis of the critical problems facing low-income renting families. The reportdraws on data from the American Housing Survey (AHS), which is funded by HUDand conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. The AHS has been conducted every2 years since 1973 and debuted a major redesign in 2015 that included a newnational and metropolitan area longitudinal sample. The AHS is a key source ofnational data on housing markets, conditions, and dynamics.Despite continued signs of a strengthening national economy, the report findsthat severe housing problems are on the rise. In 2015, 8.30 million householdshad worst case needs, up from 7.72 million in 2013 and approaching the recordhigh of 8.48 million in 2011. These households are defined as very low-incomerenters who do not receive government housing assistance and who paid morethan one-half of their income for rent, lived in severely inadequate conditions,or both. High rents in proportion to renter incomes remain dominant amonghouseholds with worst case needs, leaving these renters with substantial, unmetneed for affordable housing.The modest reduction in worst case needs observed in 2013 was not sustainedand worst case needs continued their upward trend. Specifically, severe housingproblems have grown 41 percent since the beginning of the Great Recessionin 2007 and 66 percent since 2001. Worst case needs continue to affect allsubgroups, whether defined by race and ethnicity, household structure, or locationwithin metropolitan areas or regions.Contributing most to the increase in worst case needs between 2013 and 2015was a notable shift from homeownership to renting. The magnitude of thissustained postrecession trend, along with other demographic factors, increasedthe number of very low-income renters and thereby played a major role in growingworst case needs between 2013 and 2015. Modest gains in household incomeswere met with rising rents, shrinking the supply of affordable rental housing stockin an increasingly competitive market. Even with the supply of more expensive unitsgrowing, higher-income renters occupy a growing share-43 percent-of the mostaffordable units. Only 62 affordable units are available per 100 very low-incomerenters, and only 38 units are available per 100 extremely low-income renters.This report also uses new AHS enhancements to explore the variation in worstcase needs and the distribution of housing assistance across a greater variety ofmarket geographies. These data show that, although 43.2 percent of very lowincomerenters had worst case needs nationally, local markets reflect a substantialdegree of variation beyond the longstanding trends observed across regions andtypes of metropolitan locations