The post 1965 era of immigration to the United States has been a topic of much popular debate and scholarly research. An important line of inquiry for sociologists, demographers, and policy makers alike has explored the economic, social, and demographic effects of these new-wave immigrants. A key question in this field of research concerns the migratory reaction of native-born Americans to immigration dynamics. The link between immigration and native migration has been heavily debated and no consensus has been reached. While some posit that natives in general - and poorer, less-skilled natives in particular - tend to migrate away from places receiving relatively large numbers of immigrants, other research fails to find this connection. In fact, some studies find that after controlling carefully for population size and deindustrialization natives are disproportionately attracted to places with high immigration. This research contributes to this debate by considering contemporary migration patterns in the U.S. Using county-level economic, socio-demographic, and geographic data, I predict native out-migration counts as a function of immigration and a number of place characteristics. I also consider the distance traveled by migrants as a function of immigration in counties surrounding the origin county. Results suggest that immigration, as well as pre-existing immigrant population size, does have a positive effect on native out-migration. Consistent with prior research noting the important effects of economic restructuring and deindustrialization, the immigrant effect is tempered - but remains robust - after controlling for key indicators of economic growth. Further supporting the link between immigration and migration is evidence that suggests the immigrant presence in counties surrounding the county of origin increases the distance natives migrate. Substantively, these results offer evidence in support of the hypothesis that natives continue to flee from the areas to which immigrants are most drawn.