The Federal Courts

The Federal Courts
Author: Richard A. Posner
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Total Pages: 430
Release: 1999-09-15
Genre: Law
ISBN: 0674296273

Drawing on economic and political theory, legal analysis, and his own extensive judicial experience, Posner sketches the history of the federal courts, describes the contemporary institution, appraises concerns that have been expressed with their performance, and presents a variety of proposals for both short-term and fundamental reform.

Judicial Reform Act of 1997

Judicial Reform Act of 1997
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property
Publisher:
Total Pages: 144
Release: 1997
Genre: Law
ISBN:

The Judicial Reform Act

The Judicial Reform Act
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery
Publisher:
Total Pages: 328
Release: 1968
Genre: Judges
ISBN:

Considers S. 3055 and similar S. 3060, S. 3061, and S. 3062, to reform the administrative machinery of the U.S. courts, to improve the benefits for survivors of Federal judges, and to revise retirement benefits of justices and judges of U.S. courts.

For a More Perfect Union

For a More Perfect Union
Author: United States. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations
Publisher:
Total Pages: 32
Release: 1971
Genre: Court administration
ISBN:

Creating the Judicial Branch

Creating the Judicial Branch
Author: Robert W. Tobin
Publisher: iUniverse
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2004
Genre: Court administration
ISBN: 0595322778

"One thing is clear. Courts came alive in the twentieth century and made changes that could not have been envisioned as late as World War II." From Chapter 6 Creating the Judicial Branch: The Unfinished Reform describes and assesses a recent historical phenomenon, the creation of administratively and organizationally coherent judicial systems within state government. Before 1950, the state judicial branch of government existed mostly in concept, not in operational reality. After 1950, state judges, the organized bar, and many students of the judiciary took a hard look at the way state courts were organized and managed. They concluded that state courts, particularly the trial courts, were externally dominated, highly disorganized, often unprofessional, and poorly managed, to the point where the integrity of the state courts was being seriously undermined. State after state initiated court reforms and brought about many remarkable improvements. Courts were caught up in a reform wave that swept all three branches of state government but took a unique form in the courts. Unlike the executive and legislative branches, the state courts were not simply seizing management control of their own domain but literally creating a third branch of government. They sought this objective by integrating the various components of the state judiciary into a more coherent whole and generally upgrading the level of professionalism and the quality of justice.