Chesapeake Bay Program

Chesapeake Bay Program
Author: Anu K. Mittal
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 96
Release: 2006-03
Genre:
ISBN: 9781422304600

The Chesapeake Bay Program was created in 1983 when MD, PA, VA, D.C., the Chesapeake Bay Comm., & the EPA agreed to establish a partnership to restore the Chesapeake Bay. Their most recent agreement, Chesapeake 2000,Ó sets out an agenda & 5 broad goals to guide these efforts through 2010 & contains 102 commitments that the partners agreed to accomplish. This report examines: (1) the extent to which appropriate measures for assessing restoration progress have been established; (2) the extent to which current reporting mechanisms clearly & accurately describe the Bay's overall health; (3) how much funding was provided for the effort for FY 1995 through 2004; & (4) how effectively the effort is being managed. Charts & tables.

Chesapeake Bay Program

Chesapeake Bay Program
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 93
Release: 2005
Genre: Chesapeake Bay Watershed
ISBN: 142893233X

Chesapeake Bay Program

Chesapeake Bay Program
Author: Chesapeake Executive Council. Implementation Committee
Publisher:
Total Pages: 104
Release: 1988
Genre: Chesapeake Bay Watershed
ISBN:

Chesapeake Bay Program: Recent Actions are Positive Steps Toward More Effectively Guiding the Restoration Effort

Chesapeake Bay Program: Recent Actions are Positive Steps Toward More Effectively Guiding the Restoration Effort
Author: Anu K. Mittal
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
Total Pages: 16
Release: 2009-02-01
Genre:
ISBN: 143790906X

The Chesapeake Bay Program was created in 1983 when Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, D.C., the Chesapeake Bay Comm., and the EPA agreed to establish a partnership to restore the Bay. The partnership¿s most recent agreement, ¿Chesapeake 2000,¿ sets out 4 broad goals to guide the restoration effort through 2010. This testimony summarizes the findings of an Oct. 2005 report on: (1) the extent to which measures for assessing restoration progress had been established; (2) the extent to which program reports clearly and accurately described the Bay¿s health; (3) how much funding was provided for the effort for FY 1995 to 2004; and (4) how effectively the effort was being coordinated and managed. Charts and tables.