Prepared for the Administrative Conference of the United States, an independent federal agency whose purpose is to improve procedures of US federal agencies, this report makes specific proposals for the reform of the US asylum adjudication system. The report first traces the evolution of the general international and US legal framework governing the treatment of refugees, then focuses on the factual issues inherent in the definition of refugee and the grant of refugee status. For comparative purposes, the systems of asylum adjudication of Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, France, and Switzerland are summarized, after which a detailed review of the US adjudication system is undertaken. The report provides a detailed analysis of the US system, based, according to the author, on its alleged lack of accuracy, speed and fairness. Proposals for the reform of the US system are set forth and include: creating a professional corps of trained asylum adjudicators, the institution of a non-adversarial system for adjudicating and expediting asylum demands, through the creation of a New Asylum Board, consisting of an adjudication division, an appellate division and a documentation centre. Also limited but expeditious judicial review, and rapid deportation upon a final negative adjudication.