A Comparison of Design-bid-build and Design-build Project Delivery Methods on Military Construction Projects

A Comparison of Design-bid-build and Design-build Project Delivery Methods on Military Construction Projects
Author: Darren Dwayne McWhirt
Publisher:
Total Pages: 190
Release: 2007
Genre:
ISBN:

Finally, statistical analysis demonstrated that no significant difference existed in design-build performance based on the type of facility being constructed. This result indicates that the design-build project delivery method will work equally well on all types of military construction projects.

Comparison of Design-Build to Design-Bid-Build as a Project Delivery Method

Comparison of Design-Build to Design-Bid-Build as a Project Delivery Method
Author: Linda N. Allen
Publisher:
Total Pages: 99
Release: 2001-12-01
Genre:
ISBN: 9781423522959

This study evaluates the difference between the Design-Bid-Build (DBB) and Design-Build (DB) project delivery methods. The project delivery method defines the acquisition process, relationships roles and responsibilities of the project team and the sequence of events to deliver the facility. Southwest Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command (SWDIV) bas been using both the DBB and DB project delivery methods for the past decade. The most recent four-year period has seen an increase in the use of DB project delivery. This research provides a definitive and comprehensive investigation into the comparative performance of projects delivered using these two methods. A comparison of cost schedule and quality attributes of the two types of project delivery systems was completed using specific data from 110 military construction (MCON) projects. This study included extracting all MCON projects from the financial information system (FIS) database for the period 199O-2000. The first DB project was delivered in FY 1996 therefor the study focused on MCON projects completed from FY96-2000. All completed MCON projects were used to compare performance of all projects to the focus of this research Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Category Code 721. This study included interviews to verify the financial information system (FIS) data. A Survey questionnaire was distributed as the primary tool to collect data on quality performance. Several variables critical to project performance identified during interviews survey questionnaires and data collected from FIS were also included in this study. This research should help in understanding the two project delivery methods to help an owner better select the project delivery system most suited to their specific facility goals or criteria. Results and the level of confidence that surrounds specific findings are presented.

Comparison of Design-Build to Design-Bid Build as a Project Delivery Method

Comparison of Design-Build to Design-Bid Build as a Project Delivery Method
Author: Linda N. Allen
Publisher:
Total Pages: 99
Release: 2001-12-01
Genre:
ISBN: 9781423524113

This study evaluates the difference between the Design-Bid-Build (DBB) and Design-Build (DB) project delivery methods. The project delivery method defines the acquisition process, relationships, roles and responsibilities of the project team and the sequence of events to deliver the facility. Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, (SWDIV), has been using both the DBB and DB project delivery methods for the past decade. The most recent four-year period has seen an increase in the use of DB project delivery. This research provides a definitive and comprehensive investigation into the comparative performance of projects delivered using these two methods. A comparison of cost, schedule and quality attributes of the two types of project delivery systems was completed using specific data from 110 military construction (MCON) projects. This study included extracting all MCON projects from the financial information system (FIS) database for the period 1990-2000. The first DB project was delivered in FY 1996, therefore the study focused on MCON projects completed from FY96-2000. All completed MCON projects were used to compare performance of all projects to the focus of this research, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Category Code 721. This study included interviews to verify the financial information system (FIS) data. A Survey Questionnaire was distributed as the primary tool to collect data on quality performance. Several variables critical to project performance identified during interviews, survey questionnaires and data collected from FIS were also included in this study.

An Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods

An Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods
Author: Darren Russell Hale
Publisher:
Total Pages: 152
Release: 2005
Genre: Administration and Management
ISBN:

This thesis project compares the performance of a homogeneous sample of United States Navy Bachelor Enlisted Quarters built using the Military Construction process. Projects will be broken into two sub-samples of design/bid/build and design/build projects to see if one project delivery method is superior in regards to time and cost. Project duration, project duration per bed, project time growth, cost growth and cost per bed will be statistically compared. Upon completion of the analysis the hypothesis that design/build projects are superior to design/bid/build projects in regards to time and cost will be tested.

Construction Delay Claims

Construction Delay Claims
Author: Barry B. Bramble
Publisher: Aspen Publishers
Total Pages: 1030
Release: 2010-10
Genre: Law
ISBN: 0735592861

Contracts can be your first line of defense against delays. But they have tobe drafted very carefully. Construction Delay Claims gives youan in-depth analysis of all the pertinent clauses and details what they canand can't do to minimize delays and avoid litigation.Construction Delay Claims, Fourth Edition, by Barry B. Brambleand Michael T. Callahan is written for everyone involved with delay and impactconstruction claims--the most common form of disputes in the constructionindustry. You'll find that this resource presents the most thorough, detailedreview of delay claims liability available, including a complete descriptionof the entire process for filing and pursuing claims along with more than1,950 cases and analyses.Construction Delay Claims gives you the information you need todetermine your best course of action. The book presents detailed knowledgedrawn from the authors' thirty-five years of experience in the industry.You'll learn how to anticipate delays and mitigate damages through the use ofadvanced planning and immediate responses by the parties involved. You'll alsoreceive helpful instructions about the best use of construction schedules toavert delays, or to prove their impact if they do occur.Construction Delay Claims keeps you completely up-to-date withthe changes in the construction industry, and the construction litigationprocess. Coverage includes:Effective ways to challenge a claimant's use of the Total Cost Method ofCalculationThe effectiveness of "no damages for delay" clausesThe use of ADR methods to resolve delay claimsThe meaning and implication of concurrent delaysCumulative impact effect of multiple change ordersThe impact and probability of delays in design-build, construction management,and multiple prime contractingLatest research into the effect and measurement of lost productivityThe most recent assessments of how states are applying the Eichleayformula

Design Build Project Delivery in the Air Force Reserve Command

Design Build Project Delivery in the Air Force Reserve Command
Author: Kathleen Richardson
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2009
Genre: Construction projects
ISBN:

Design Build is rapidly becoming one of the most commonly used project delivery methods in the construction industry. The United States Corp of Engineers (USACE) has started implementing its own version of Design Build with the introduction of Military Transformation in April 2005. Per the Department of the Army (2008) Military Transformation is a term employed by the Corps to implement the use of alternate project delivery method as a means of achieving best value. The United States Air Force (AF) and the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) are expected to establish a target of 75% of all future Military Construction Projects (MILCONs) executed when using the Design Build method. The use of this delivery method results in significant changes to the relationships between the various parties associated with facility project delivery compared to the traditional Design Bid Build method. AFRC construction project procedures and requirements must also change.

Joint Public Procurement and Innovation

Joint Public Procurement and Innovation
Author: Gabriella Margherita Racca
Publisher: Bruylant
Total Pages: 534
Release: 2020-02-12
Genre: Law
ISBN: 2802765299

Innovation in public procurement is essential for sustainable and inclusive growth in an increasingly globalized economy. To achieve that potential, both the promises and the perils of innovation must be investigated, including the risks and opportunities of joint procurement across borders in the European Union and the United States. This in-depth research investigates innovation in public procurement from three different perspectives. First, leading academics and practitioners assess the purchase of innovation, with a particular focus on urban public contracting in smart cities involving meta-infrastructures, public-private partnership arrangements and smart contracts. A second line of inquiry looks for ways to encourage innovative suppliers. Here, the collected authors draw on emerging lessons from the US and Europe, to explore both the costs and the benefits of spurring innovation through procurement. A third perspective looks to various innovations in the procurement process itself, with a focus on the effects of joint and cross-border procurement in the EU and US landscapes. The chapters review new technologies and platforms, the increasingly automated means of selecting suppliers, and the related efficiencies that “big data” can bring to public procurement. Expanding on research in the editors’ prior volume, Integrity and Efficiency in Sustainable Public Contracts: Balancing Corruption Concerns in Public Procurement Internationally (Bruylant 2014), this volume builds on a series of academic conferences and exchanges to address these issues from sophisticated academic, institutional and practical perspectives, and to point the way to future research on the contractual models that are emerging from new procurement technologies.

The Performance of the Design-build Alternative Delivery Approach in Military Construction

The Performance of the Design-build Alternative Delivery Approach in Military Construction
Author: Allan Lee Webster
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 1997
Genre:
ISBN:

The U.S. construction industry is highly competitive, as well as fragmented. Despite this, construction has a significant impact on the U.S. economy. In 1994, the National Science and Technology Council estimated that the industry provided over 10 million jobs and produced $850 billion in project revenues (new construction and renovation) or approximately 13% of the gross domestic product (Wright, 1995). Unfortunately, the industry has been in a long downward slide and has only recently begun to recover. The problems of the U.S. construction industry in previous decades have been well documented, discussed and analyzed. Historically, the construction industry is slow to change (Schriener, 1995). In recent decades, the fluctuation in the building market, specialization, dissatisfaction with the traditional design-bid-build process, rising costs, schedule delays, demands for higher quality and increasing litigation have forced those in the construction industry to adapt or be driven out of business. Additionally, owners who do not tolerate poor quality and high costs within their own firm cannot and will not tolerate poor business practices within the construction industry. A quote from a 1983 study by the Business Roundtable perhaps best sums up the problems of the construction industry: 'Owners, who pay the bills, no longer get their money's worth for construction in the United States' (p. 3). Alternate delivery/contracting methods, modernization, value engineering, partnering and more aggressive management practices have come to the forefront as the construction industry attempts to counter its decline. For example, the design-build delivery approach has fast become an accepted project methodology. The U.S. Department of Commerce predicts that design-build will account for half of all nonresidential U.S. construction by 2001 (Rosenbaum 1995).